Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

被引:133
|
作者
Nelson, Bradford [1 ]
Kaufman, Melissa [1 ]
Broughton, Gregory [1 ]
Cookson, Michael S. [1 ]
Chang, Sam S. [1 ]
Herrell, S. Duke [1 ]
Baumgartner, Roxelyn G. [1 ]
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2007年 / 177卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatectomy; adverse effects; prostatic neoplasms; robotics;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity and length of stay for a number of surgical procedures. Furthermore, length of stay after open radical prostatectomy has decreased dramatically during the last decade. We examined differences in length of stay between a prospectively evaluated cohort of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Between January 2003 and March 2006, 1,003 radical prostatectomies were performed at our hospital. Data were collected in prospective fashion and a comparison was made between 374 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and 629 who underwent robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Length of stay, factors influencing length of stay, readmission rates and unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were evaluated. Patients in the 2 groups were treated using the same clinical care pathway. Results: Overall 94.3% of patients in the radical retropubic prostatectomy group and 97.5% in the robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group were discharged home on or before postoperative day 1. Mean length of stay in the radical retropubic and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy groups was 1.25 (median 1.09) and 1.17 days (median 1.03), which was similar and not statistically different (p = 0.27). Readmission rates were similar in robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients (7% and 5%, respectively, p = 0.12). Unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were the same in the robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy groups (10%, p = 0.95). Conclusions: Patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy can be treated on the same clinical pathway. A targeted hospital discharge date of postoperative day I can be achieved in the majority of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Readmission rates or unscheduled hospital visits are necessary in a small percent of patients treated with an early discharge program, of which the majority are caused by ileus.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 931
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A comparison of length of sick leave
    Hohwu, Lena
    Akre, Olof
    Pedersen, Knud Venborg
    Jonsson, Martin
    Nielsen, Claus Vinther
    Gustafsson, Ove
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 43 (04): : 259 - 264
  • [32] Comparison of lymph node yield in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with that in open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Pe, Mark L.
    Thumar, Adeep B.
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Lee, Franklin C.
    McCue, Peter
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (07) : 1136 - 1140
  • [33] Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy: 10 years of cases at Ramathibodi Hospital
    Sirisopana, Kun
    Jenjitranant, Pocharapong
    Sangkum, Premsant
    Kijvikai, Kittinut
    Pacharatakul, Suthep
    Leenanupun, Charoen
    Kochakarn, Wachira
    Kongchareonsombat, Wisoot
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2019, 8 (05) : 467 - +
  • [34] Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery
    Elcio Silva
    Ubirajara Ferreira
    Gustavo D. Silva
    Mirandolino B. Mariano
    Nelson R. Netto
    Athanase Billis
    Luis A. Magna
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2007, 39 : 865 - 869
  • [35] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Is There Any Real Difference?
    Healy, Kelly A.
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2013, 40 (03) : 286 - 296
  • [36] Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Osmonov, Daniar K.
    Faddan, Amr A.
    Aksenov, Alexey V.
    Naumann, Carsten M.
    Rapoport, Leonid M.
    Bezrukov, Evgeny A.
    Tsarichenko, Dmitry G.
    Juenemann, Klaus P.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 44 (04): : 303 - 310
  • [38] Surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: a comparison between retropubic and laparoscopic surgery
    Silva, Elcio
    Ferreira, Ubirajara
    Silva, Gustavo D.
    Mariano, Mirandolino B.
    Netto, Nelson R., Jr.
    Billis, Athanase
    Magna, Luis A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2007, 39 (03) : 865 - 869
  • [39] Pretreatment Expectations of Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic or Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy
    Schroeck, Florian R.
    Krupski, Tracey L.
    Stewart, Suzanne B.
    Banez, Lionel L.
    Gerber, Leah
    Albala, David M.
    Moul, Judd W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03): : 894 - 898