Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

被引:133
|
作者
Nelson, Bradford [1 ]
Kaufman, Melissa [1 ]
Broughton, Gregory [1 ]
Cookson, Michael S. [1 ]
Chang, Sam S. [1 ]
Herrell, S. Duke [1 ]
Baumgartner, Roxelyn G. [1 ]
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2007年 / 177卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; prostatectomy; adverse effects; prostatic neoplasms; robotics;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.070
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity and length of stay for a number of surgical procedures. Furthermore, length of stay after open radical prostatectomy has decreased dramatically during the last decade. We examined differences in length of stay between a prospectively evaluated cohort of patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Between January 2003 and March 2006, 1,003 radical prostatectomies were performed at our hospital. Data were collected in prospective fashion and a comparison was made between 374 patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and 629 who underwent robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Length of stay, factors influencing length of stay, readmission rates and unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were evaluated. Patients in the 2 groups were treated using the same clinical care pathway. Results: Overall 94.3% of patients in the radical retropubic prostatectomy group and 97.5% in the robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy group were discharged home on or before postoperative day 1. Mean length of stay in the radical retropubic and robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy groups was 1.25 (median 1.09) and 1.17 days (median 1.03), which was similar and not statistically different (p = 0.27). Readmission rates were similar in robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy patients (7% and 5%, respectively, p = 0.12). Unscheduled clinic or emergency room visits were the same in the robot assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy groups (10%, p = 0.95). Conclusions: Patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy or robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy can be treated on the same clinical pathway. A targeted hospital discharge date of postoperative day I can be achieved in the majority of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Readmission rates or unscheduled hospital visits are necessary in a small percent of patients treated with an early discharge program, of which the majority are caused by ileus.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 931
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy) and radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Guru, KA
    Bhandari, A
    Peabody, J
    Oja-Tebbe, N
    Kaul, S
    Dasari, S
    Tewari, A
    Menon, M
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 43 - 44
  • [3] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after aborted retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk K.J.
    Huang A.C.
    Williams S.B.
    Yu H.-Y.
    Hu J.C.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (3) : 301 - 304
  • [4] Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy: Comparison between surgical time, complications and length of hospital stay
    Martinez-Holguin, E.
    Herranz-Amo, F.
    Hernandez-Cavieres, J.
    Lledo-Garcia, E.
    Subira-Rios, D.
    Renedo-Villar, T.
    Hernandez-Fernandez, C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2020, 44 (01): : 41 - 48
  • [5] A comparison of the perioperative data after open radical retropubic prostatectomy or robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Uvin, P.
    de Meyer, Jean-Marie
    Van Holderbeke, Guido
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 14 : 117 - 117
  • [6] Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy: Assessment of perioperative pain
    Webster, TM
    Herrell, SD
    Baumgartner, RG
    Anderson, L
    Smith, JA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 44 - 44
  • [7] A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Chan, Robert C.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Clark, Peter E.
    Baumgartner, Roxy
    Cookson, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (06): : 2385 - 2389
  • [8] Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Abbas Basiri
    Jean JMCH de la Rosette
    Shahin Tabatabaei
    Henry H. Woo
    M. Pilar Laguna
    Hamidreza Shemshaki
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 609 - 621
  • [9] Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?
    Basiri, Abbas
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Tabatabaei, Shahin
    Woo, Henry H.
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    Shemshaki, Hamidreza
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 609 - 621