Individual differences in the attentional modulation of the human auditory brainstem response to speech inform on speech-in-noise deficits

被引:28
|
作者
Saiz-Alia, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Forte, Antonio Elia [3 ]
Reichenbach, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Bioengn, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Neurotechnol, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Harvard Univ, John A Paulson Sch Engn & Appl Sci, 29 Oxford St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; EFFERENT SUPPRESSION; RECEPTION THRESHOLDS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPUTER-MODEL; NORMAL-HEARING; YOUNG-ADULTS; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-50773-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
People with normal hearing thresholds can nonetheless have difficulty with understanding speech in noisy backgrounds. The origins of such supra-threshold hearing deficits remain largely unclear. Previously we showed that the auditory brainstem response to running speech is modulated by selective attention, evidencing a subcortical mechanism that contributes to speech-in-noise comprehension. We observed, however, significant variation in the magnitude of the brainstem's attentional modulation between the different volunteers. Here we show that this variability relates to the ability of the subjects to understand speech in background noise. In particular, we assessed 43 young human volunteers with normal hearing thresholds for their speech-in-noise comprehension. We also recorded their auditory brainstem responses to running speech when selectively attending to one of two competing voices. To control for potential peripheral hearing deficits, and in particular for cochlear synaptopathy, we further assessed noise exposure, the temporal sensitivity threshold, the middle-ear muscle reflex, and the auditory-brainstem response to clicks in various levels of background noise. These tests did not show evidence for cochlear synaptopathy amongst the volunteers. Furthermore, we found that only the attentional modulation of the brainstem response to speech was significantly related to speech-in-noise comprehension. Our results therefore evidence an impact of top-down modulation of brainstem activity on the variability in speech-in-noise comprehension amongst the subjects.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modulation of Speech-in-Noise Comprehension Through Transcranial Current Stimulation With the Phase-Shifted Speech Envelope
    Kadir, Shabnam
    Kaza, Chrysoula
    Weissbart, Hugo
    Reichenbach, Tobias
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2020, 28 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [22] Revisiting Auditory Profiling: Can Cognitive Factors Improve the Prediction of Aided Speech-in-Noise Outcome?
    Wu, Mengfan
    Christiansen, Stine
    Fereczkowski, Michal
    Neher, Tobias
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2022, 26
  • [23] Speech-evoked auditory brainstem response; electrophysiological evidence of upper brainstem facilitative role on sound lateralization in noise
    Moossavi, Abdollah
    Lotfi, Yones
    Javanbakht, Mohanna
    Faghihzadeh, Soghrat
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 41 (03) : 611 - 617
  • [24] Effect of Noise Reduction on Cortical Speech-in-Noise Processing and Its Variance due to Individual Noise Tolerance
    Kim, Subong
    Wu, Yu-Hsiang
    Bharadwaj, Hari M.
    Choi, Inyong
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (03) : 849 - 861
  • [25] A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults
    Anderson, Samira
    White-Schwoch, Travis
    Parbery-Clark, Alexandra
    Kraus, Nina
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 300 : 18 - 32
  • [26] Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech
    Kong, Ying-Yee
    Somarowthu, Ala
    Ding, Nai
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 16 (06): : 783 - 796
  • [27] Performance on stochastic figure-ground perception varies with individual differences in speech-in-noise recognition and working memory capacity
    Johns, Michael A.
    Calloway, Regina C.
    Phillips, Ian
    Karuzis, Valerie P.
    Dutta, Kelsey
    Smith, Ed
    Shamma, Shihab A.
    Goupell, Matthew J.
    Kuchinsky, Stefanie E.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 153 (01) : 286 - 303
  • [28] Psychometric function for speech-in-noise tests accounts for word-recognition deficits in older listeners
    Ross, Bernhard
    Dobri, Simon
    Schumann, Annette
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2021, 149 (04) : 2337 - 2352
  • [29] Bilinguals at the "cocktail party": Dissociable neural activity in auditory-linguistic brain regions reveals neurobiological basis for nonnative listeners' speech-in-noise recognition deficits
    Bidelman, Gavin M.
    Dexter, Lauren
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2015, 143 : 32 - 41
  • [30] Comparing Sound-Field Speech-Auditory Brainstem Response Components between Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Recognition in Noise Scores
    Jarollahi, Farnoush
    Valadbeigi, Ayub
    Jalaei, Bahram
    Maarefvand, Mohammad
    Motasaddi Zarandy, Masoud
    Haghani, Hamid
    Shirzhiyzn, Zahra
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2022, 16 (02) : 93 - 105