Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated With Porcine Urinary Bladder Extracellular Matrix and Total Contact Cast: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled Trial

被引:0
作者
Alvarez, Oscar M. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Tashara [1 ]
Gilbert, Thomas W. [3 ]
Onumah, Neh J. [4 ]
Wendelken, Martin E. [1 ]
Parker, Rachelle [1 ]
Markowitz, Lee [1 ]
机构
[1] Calvary Hosp, Ctr Curat & Palliat Wound Care, Bronx, NY USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Dept Med, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[3] ACell Inc, Columbia, MD USA
[4] Skin All Color Dermatol & Aesthet Med LLC, East Windsor, NJ USA
来源
WOUNDS-A COMPENDIUM OF CLINICAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE | 2017年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
urinary bladder matrix; extracellular matrix; diabetic foot ulcers; total contact cast; wound healing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of a porcine urinary bladder-derived extracellular matrix (UBM) for the treatment of recalcitrant, neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Materials and Methods. This prospective, parallel, randomized, single-center study involving 17 subjects was performed in an outpatient wound care center setting. Each subject with a DFU was randomized (2:1) to receive the urinary bladder matrix (UBM) plus offloading with a total contact cast (TCC) or standard care (nonadherent dressing plus TCC). All DFUs were on the plantar surface of the foot and all were Grade I-A according to the University of Texas Wound Classification System. A traditional TCC was used in all patients and consisted of a minimally padded, well-molded, and rigid (plaster plus fiberglass) construct that maintains contact with the entire plantar surface of the foot and lower leg. The endpoints of the study were wound healing at 12 and 16 weeks and ulcer recurrence at 1 year. Wound evaluations were performed weekly and wound surface area was measured by photo-digital planimetry. Results. In the UBM group, the incidence of wound healing at 12 and 16 weeks was 90% and 100%, respectively, compared with 33% and 83.3% in the control (P =.062). The mean time to healing in the UBMtreated group was 62.4 days compared with 92.8 days in the control " group (P=.031). The incidence of ulcer recurrence at 1 year was 10% (1/11) in the UBM-treated group and 50% (3/6) in the control. Conclusion. Results of this interim analysis suggest treatment of DFUs with a UBM could significantly reduce the time to healing and improve the rate of recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] Kimmel Howard, 2010, J Am Col Certif Wound Spec, V2, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jcws.2010.11.002
  • [12] Diabetic foot syndrome - Evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort
    Lavery, LA
    Armstrong, DG
    Wunderlich, RP
    Tredwell, J
    Boulton, AJM
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (05) : 1435 - 1438
  • [13] Porcine urinary bladder matrix: a retrospective study and establishment of protocol
    LeCheminant, J.
    Field, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2012, 21 (10) : 476 - 482
  • [14] Rishi Malhotra, BmedSci, BMBS, MRCS (Eng), Claire Shu-Yi Chan and Aziz Nather, FRCS ( Ed)
    Malhotra, Rishi
    Chan, Claire Shu-Yi
    Nather, Aziz
    [J]. DIABETIC FOOT & ANKLE, 2014, 5 (01):
  • [15] The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers - Results of a prospective randomized trial
    Marston, WA
    Hanft, J
    Norwood, P
    Pollak, R
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (06) : 1701 - 1705
  • [16] Niezgoda Jeffrey A, 2005, Adv Skin Wound Care, V18, P258, DOI 10.1097/00129334-200506000-00012
  • [17] Parcells AL, 2014, WOUNDS, V26, P189
  • [18] Risk factors for recurrent diabetic foot ulcers - Site matters
    Peters, Edgar J. G.
    Armstrong, David G.
    Lavery, Lawrence A.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 (08) : 2077 - 2079
  • [19] Pradhan L, 2012, DIABETIC FOOT MED SU, P151
  • [20] Percent change in wound area of diabetic foot ulcers over a 4-week period is a robust predictor of complete healing in a 12-week prospective trial
    Sheehan, P
    Jones, P
    Caselli, A
    Giurini, JM
    Veves, A
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (06) : 1879 - 1882