Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis

被引:286
作者
Tang, JL [1 ]
Liu, JLY
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Dept Community & Family Med, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Ctr Clin Trials & Epidemiol Res, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
funnel plot; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; selection bias; publication bias; statistical method; systematic reviews;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00204-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Publication and other forms of selection biases pose a threat to the validity of meta-analysis. Funnel plots are usually used to detect such biases; asymmetrical plots are interpreted to suggest that biases are present. Using 198 published meta-analyses, we demonstrate that the shape of a funnel plot is largely determined by the arbitrary choice of the method to construct the plot. When a different definition of precision and/or effect measure were used, the conclusion about the shape of the plot was altered in 37 (86%) of the 43 meta-analyses with an asymmetrical plot suggesting selection bias. In the absence of a consensus on how the plot should be constructed, asymmetrical funnel plots should be interpreted cautiously. These findings also suggest that the discrepancies between large trials and corresponding meta-analyses and heterogeneity in meta-analyses may also be determined by how they are evaluated. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 484
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] INVITED COMMENTARY - BENEFITS OF HETEROGENEITY IN METAANALYSIS OF DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES
    BERLIN, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (04) : 383 - 387
  • [2] BERLIN JA, 1989, J AM STAT ASSOC, V84, P381
  • [3] BOULVAIN M, 1998, STRIPPING SWEEPING M
  • [4] Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials - How do their results compare?
    Cappelleri, JC
    Ioannidis, JPA
    Schmid, CH
    deFerranti, SD
    Aubert, M
    Chalmers, TC
    Lau, J
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (16): : 1332 - 1338
  • [5] DAVEYSMITH G, 1994, BRIT MED J, V308, P72
  • [6] DAVEYSMITH G, 1993, BRIT MED J, V306, P1367
  • [7] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [8] FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS
    DICKERSIN, K
    MIN, YI
    MEINERT, CL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (03): : 374 - 378
  • [9] PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    EASTERBROOK, PJ
    BERLIN, JA
    GOPALAN, R
    MATTHEWS, DR
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) : 867 - 872
  • [10] Meta-analysis - Bias in location and selection of studies
    Egger, M
    Smith, GD
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124): : 61 - 66