Combination chemotherapy with methotrexate, etoposide, and actinomycin D for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors

被引:62
作者
Matsui, H [1 ]
Suzuka, K [1 ]
Iitsuka, Y [1 ]
Seki, K [1 ]
Sekiya, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chuo Ku, Chiba 2608670, Japan
关键词
gestational trophoblastic tumors; high risk; combination chemotherapy; toxicity;
D O I
10.1006/gyno.2000.5813
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and survival of patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTTs) treated with a methotrexate-etoposide-actinomycin D (MEA) regimen without cyclosphosphamide or vincristine. Methods. Thirty-nine consecutive patients with high-risk GTTs (28 were defined high risk by WHO criteria) were treated with primarily the MEA regimen. Among them, 27 patients had received no prior chemotherapy and 12 had received prior chemotherapy. Survival, causes of treatment failure, and toxicity were analyzed retrospectively. Results. After treatment with the MEA regimen, 29 of 39 patients achieved primary remission (74.4%), 8 developed resistance (20.5%), and 2 died of widespread metastases and chemotherapy-related toxicity. All 8 patients who developed resistance were treated with high-dose 5-fluorouracil and actinomycin D (FA); 6 were salvaged and 2 died of refractory disease. Three patients relapsed; 2 were controlled with FA or cisplatin-based chemotherapy and 1 who refused further treatment died. The disease-free survival rate was 87%. WHO grade 4 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia with the MEA regimen occurred in 5.3 and 6.4%, respectively, of the cycles; other toxic effects were acceptable and manageable. Conclusions. At present, MEA chemotherapy (without cyclophosphamide or vincristine) is our treatment of choice for patients with high-risk GTT. Its toxicity is predictable and manageable. For patients who become resistant to MEA, new salvage chemotherapy regimens are needed. (C) 2000 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 31
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   EMA/CO REGIMEN IN HIGH-RISK GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC TUMOR (GTT) [J].
BOLIS, G ;
BONAZZI, C ;
LANDONI, F ;
MANGILI, G ;
VERGADORO, F ;
ZANABONI, F ;
MANGIONI, C .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1988, 31 (03) :439-444
[2]   EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors: Results from a cohort of 272 patients [J].
Bower, M ;
Newlands, ES ;
Holden, L ;
Short, D ;
Brock, C ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Begent, RHJ ;
Bagshawe, KD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (07) :2636-2643
[3]   TREATMENT OF METASTATIC TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE - GOOD AND POOR PROGNOSIS [J].
HAMMOND, CB ;
BORCHERT, LG ;
TYREY, L ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
PARKER, RT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1973, 115 (04) :451-457
[4]  
LURAIN JR, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P830
[5]   Comparison of chemotherapies with methotrexate, VP-16 and actinomycin-D in low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease [J].
Matsui, H ;
Iitsuka, Y ;
Seki, K ;
Sekiya, S .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1998, 46 (01) :5-8
[6]  
MORTAKIS AE, 1990, OBSTET GYNECOL, V76, P272
[7]   ANTI-TUMOR ACTIVITY OF THE EPIPODOPHYLLIN DERIVATIVE VP16-213 (ETOPOSIDE-NSC-141540) IN GESTATIONAL CHORIOCARCINOMA [J].
NEWLANDS, ES ;
BAGSHAWE, KD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1980, 16 (03) :401-405
[8]   RESULTS WITH THE EMA/CO (ETOPOSIDE, METHOTREXATE, ACTINOMYCIN-D, CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, VINCRISTINE) REGIMEN IN HIGH-RISK GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC TUMORS, 1979 TO 1989 [J].
NEWLANDS, ES ;
BAGSHAWE, KD ;
BEGENT, RHJ ;
RUSTIN, GJS ;
HOLDEN, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (06) :550-557
[9]   DEVELOPMENTS IN CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MEDIUM-RISK AND HIGH-RISK PATIENTS WITH GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC TUMORS (1979-1984) [J].
NEWLANDS, ES ;
BAGSHAWE, KD ;
BEGENT, RHJ ;
RUSTIN, GJS ;
HOLDEN, L ;
DENT, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1986, 93 (01) :63-69
[10]   EMACO IN HIGH-RISK GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLAST DISEASE - THE AUSTRALIAN EXPERIENCE [J].
QUINN, M ;
MURRAY, J ;
FRIEDLANDER, M ;
STEIGRAD, S ;
KHOO, S ;
MARSDEN, D ;
HAMMOND, I ;
JOBLING, T .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 34 (01) :90-92