Assessing changes in the conservation status of threatened Brazilian vertebrates

被引:12
作者
Paglia, Adriano Pereira [1 ,2 ]
Fonseca, Gustavo Alberto B. [3 ]
机构
[1] CI Brasil, BR-30112021 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Zool, PPG ECMVS, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[3] Global Environm Facil, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Threatened species; IUCN Red List; Extinction risk; Brazil; Vertebrates; IUCN RED LIST; CRITERIA; FUTURE; EXTINCTIONS; KNOWLEDGE; RATES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10531-009-9660-0
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Threatened species assessments are one of the tools used to evaluate the degree of human impact on biodiversity, particularly in the assignment of extinction probabilities to individual species. Heavily altered habitats or biomes harbor a high proportion of the threatened species that have been assessed globally-80% of all of threatened species in IUCN's Red List owe their poor status at least partly to the loss of habitat. Some taxonomic groups, however, may be well represented in the Red Lists either because they are naturally more sensitive to the most pervasive threats, or simply because they have been better studied. Here we look at the threat patterns on a temporal scale of Brazilian animal species included in the IUCN Red List, evaluating the hypotheses that directions of changes in red list status can be explained by the increase in scientific knowledge or by actual changes in threat factors. We analyzed changes in patterns of threatened vertebrates in IUCN's list between 2002 and 2006. During that period, 120 species changed their status. 42 of these changes referred to inclusions and 78 to changes of threat category. For the latter group, 23 had their status upgraded to categories of higher threat, and 55 downgraded to others of lower threat. Most of the downgrades were caused by increase in scientific knowledge, while most of the upgrades resulted from the deterioration of the environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:3563 / 3577
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, IUCN RED LIST CAT CR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BIOSTATISTICAL ANAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 2006 IUCN RED LIST T
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, 2004 IUCN RED LIST T
[5]   Measuring the changing state of nature [J].
Balmford, A ;
Green, RE ;
Jenkins, M .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2003, 18 (07) :326-330
[6]   Are listed threatened plant species actually at risk? [J].
Burgman, MA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2002, 50 (01) :1-13
[7]  
Butchart S, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P1200, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.03038.x
[8]   Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond [J].
Butchart, SHM ;
Stattersfield, AJ ;
Baillie, J ;
Bennun, LA ;
Stuart, SN ;
Akçakaya, HR ;
Hilton-Taylor, C ;
Mace, GM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 360 (1454) :255-268
[9]   Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity:: Red list indices for birds [J].
Butchart, SHM ;
Stattersfield, AJ ;
Bennun, LA ;
Shutes, SM ;
Akçakaya, HR ;
Baillie, JEM ;
Stuart, SN ;
Hilton-Taylor, C ;
Mace, GM .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (12) :2294-2304
[10]  
*CBD, 2004, DEC AD C PART CONV B