Energy metabolism of pregnant zebu and crossbred zebu dairy cattle

被引:1
作者
Lage, Helena Ferreira [1 ]
da Costa Cruz Borges, Ana Luiza [1 ]
e Silva, Ricardo Reis [1 ]
Borges, Alan Maia [1 ]
Mendes Ruas, Jose Reinaldo [2 ]
Araujo de Carvalho, Pedro Henrique [1 ]
Fonseca, Marcelina Pereira [1 ]
Dutra Vivenza, Paolo Antonio [1 ]
Goncalves, Lucio Carlos [1 ]
de Souza, Andre Santos [1 ]
de Carvalho, Antonio Ultimo [1 ]
Facury Filho, Elias Jorge [1 ]
Silva, Edilane Aparecida [3 ]
da Gloria, Joana Ribeiro [1 ]
Ferreira, Alexandre Lima [1 ]
Meneses, Rodrigo Melo [1 ]
Simoes Saliba, Eloisa de Oliveira [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Vet Sch, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Unimontes, Dept Anim Sci, Janauba, MG, Brazil
[3] Empresa Pesquisa Agr Minas Gerais, Uberaba, MG, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 02期
关键词
NUTRIENT RESTRICTION; OXYGEN-CONSUMPTION; GRAVID UTERUS; GROWTH; MIDGESTATION; LACTATION; HOLSTEIN; HEIFERS; PROTEIN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0246208
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the energy partition of pregnant F1 Holstein x Gyr with average initial body weight (BW) of 515.6 kg and Gyr cows with average initial BW of 435.1 kg at 180, 210 and 240 days of gestation, obtained using respirometry. Twelve animals in two groups (six per genetic group) received a restricted diet equivalent to 1.3 times the net energy for maintenance (NEm). The proportion of gross energy intake (GEI) lost as feces did not differ between the evaluated breeds and corresponded to 28.65% on average. The daily methane production (L/d) was greater for (P<0.05) F1 HxG compared to Gyr animals. However, when expressed as L/kg dry matter (DM) or as percentage of GEI there were no differences between the groups (P>0.05). The daily loss of energy as urine (mean of 1.42 Mcal/d) did not differ (P>0.05) between groups and ranged from 3.87 to 5.35% of the GEI. The metabolizable energy intake (MEI) of F1 HxG animals was greater (P < 0.05) at all gestational stages compared to Gyr cows when expressed in Mcal/d. However, when expressed in kcal/kg of metabolic BW (BW0,75), the F1 HxG cows had MEI 11% greater (P<0.05) at 240 days of gestation and averaged 194.39 kcal/kg of BW0,75. Gyr cows showed no change in MEI over time (P>0.05), with a mean of 146.66 kcal/kg BW0. 75. The ME used by the conceptus was calculated by deducting the metabolizable energy for maintenance (MEm) from the MEI, which was obtained in a previous study using the same cows prior to becoming pregnant. The values of NEm obtained in the previous study with similar non-pregnant cows were 92.02 kcal/kg BW0.75 for F1 HxG, and 76.83 kcal/kg BW0.75 for Gyr (P = 0.06). The average ME for pregnancy (MEp) was 5.33 Mcal/d for F1 HxG and 4.46 Mcal/d for Gyr. The metabolizability ratio, averaging 0.60, was similar among the evaluated groups (P>0.05). The ME / Digestible Energy (DE) ratio differed between groups and periods evaluated (P<0.05) with a mean of 0.84. The heat increment (HI) accounted for 22.74% and 24.38% of the GEI for F1 HxG and Gyr cows, respectively. The proportion of GEI used in the basal metabolism by pregnant cows in this study represented 29.69%. However, there were no differences between the breeds and the evaluation periods and corresponded to 29.69%. The mean NE for pregnancy (NEp) was 2.76 Mcal/d and did not differ between groups and gestational stages (P>0.05).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Body composition and energy and protein requirements of dairy crossbreeds and zebu bovines, castrated, in the growing and fattening phases
    Backes, AA
    Paulino, MF
    Alves, DD
    Rennó, LN
    Valadares, SD
    Lana, RP
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 34 (01): : 257 - 267
  • [22] Risk factors for prolonged estrus in crossbred dairy cattle
    Singh, Jagir
    Ghuman, S. P. S.
    Honparkhe, M.
    Dadarwal, D.
    Dhaliwal, G. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2012, 82 (01) : 20 - 23
  • [23] Whole-genome resequencing reveals selection signatures associated with milk production traits in African Kenana dairy zebu cattle
    Nanaei, Hojjat Asadollahpour
    Qanatqestani, Mostafa Dehghani
    Esmailizadeh, Ali
    GENOMICS, 2020, 112 (01) : 880 - 885
  • [24] Effect of fiber levels and protein sources on the eating behavior of crossbred Holstein-Zebu heifers
    Queiroz, AC
    Neves, JS
    Miranda, LF
    Pereira, JC
    Pereira, ES
    Dutra, AR
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2001, 53 (01) : 84 - 88
  • [25] Characterization of the Exonic Regions of the JY-1 Gene in Zebu Cattle and Buffaloes
    de Camargo, G. M. F.
    Baldi, F.
    Regitano, L. C. A.
    Tonhati, H.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2013, 48 (06) : 918 - 922
  • [26] EFFECT OF CLITORAL STIMULATION AFTER ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION ON CONCEPTION IN ZEBU CROSSBRED HEIFERS IN THE TROPICS
    SEGURA, CVM
    RODRIGUEZ, ROL
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 1994, 42 (05) : 781 - 787
  • [27] Usefulness of Rectal Palpation and Transrectal Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Gestation of the Zebu Cattle in the Humid Tropical in Costa Rica
    Alonso-Alanusa, Liliana
    Galina-Hidalgo, Carlos
    Jose Romero-Zuniga, Juan
    Estrada-Koenig, Sandra
    Galindo-Badilla, Jaime
    REVISTA CIENTIFICA-FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS VETERINARIAS, 2012, 22 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [28] Day-to-day variation in yield, composition and somatic cell count of saleable milk in hand-milked zebu dairy cattle
    Millogo, V.
    Ouedraogo, G. A.
    Agenas, S.
    Svennersten-Sjaunja, K.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2009, 4 (03): : 151 - 155
  • [29] PERFORMANCE OF CROSSBRED DAIRY CATTLE AT MILITARY DAIRY FARMS IN PAKISTAN
    Hassan, F.
    Khan, M. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES, 2013, 23 (03) : 705 - 714
  • [30] Effect of fiber level and protein source on live weight gain of crossbred Holstein-Zebu heifers
    Queiroz, AC
    Neves, JS
    Miranda, LF
    Pereira, ES
    Pereira, JC
    Dutra, AR
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2001, 53 (01) : 89 - 93