Life Cycle Assessment and resource analysis of all-solid-state batteries

被引:81
|
作者
Troy, Stefanie [1 ]
Schreiber, Andrea [1 ]
Reppert, Thorsten [2 ]
Gehrke, Hans-Gregot [2 ]
Finsterbusch, Martin [2 ]
Uhlenbruck, Sven [2 ]
Stenzel, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Syst Anal & Technol Eva, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Mat Synth & Proc IEK 1, D-52425 Julich, Germany
关键词
All-solid-state battery; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Upscaling effects; Resource analysis; LITHIUM-ION BATTERY; ENERGY-STORAGE SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; PHASE-STABILITY; CONDUCTIVITY; LI7LA3ZR2O12; CRITICALITY; METAL; ELECTROLYTES; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.064
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this investigation the environmental impacts of the manufacturing processes of a new all-solid-state battery (SSB) concept in a pouch bag housing were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for the first time. To do so, the different production steps were investigated in detail, based on actual laboratory scale production processes. All in- and outputs regarding material and energy flows were collected and assessed. As LCA investigations of products in an early state of research and development usually result in comparatively higher results than those of mature technologies in most impact categories, potential future improvements of production processes and efficiency were considered by adding two concepts to the investigation. Apart from the laboratory production which depicts the current workflow, an idealized laboratory production and a possible industrial production were portrayed as well. The results indicate that electricity consumption plays a big role due to a lot of high temperature production steps. It needs to be improved for future industrial production. Also enhanced battery performance can strongly influence the results. Overall the laboratory scale results indeed improve strongly when assuming a careful use of resources, which will likely be a predominant target for industrial production. These findings therefore highlight hotspots and give improvement targets for future developments. It can also be deducted, that a comparison to the results of competing technologies that have already reached a commercial stage is not recommended for early LCAs. To round things off a resource analysis was also conducted. It identifies the usage of lanthanum, lithium and zirconium oxide as critical, especially when taking laboratory production as a base. When looking at the scale up to industrial production parameters, lanthanum and lithium remain critical, zirconium oxide not. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 767
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metastable Materials for All-Solid-State Batteries
    Sakuda, Atsushi
    Hayashi, Akitoshi
    Tatsumisago, Masahiro
    ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2019, 87 (05) : 247 - 250
  • [2] Assessment of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries
    Braun, P.
    Uhlmann, C.
    Weiss, M.
    Weber, A.
    Ivers-Tiffee, E.
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2018, 393 : 119 - 127
  • [3] Environmental life cycle assessment of emerging solid-state batteries: A review
    Mandade, Prasad
    Weil, Marcel
    Baumann, Manuel
    Wei, Zhixuan
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL ADVANCES, 2023, 13
  • [4] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries for sustainable design and manufacturing
    Jingyi Zhang
    Xinyou Ke
    Yu Gu
    Fenfen Wang
    Duanyang Zheng
    Kang Shen
    Chris Yuan
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 227 - 237
  • [5] Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries for sustainable design and manufacturing
    Zhang, Jingyi
    Ke, Xinyou
    Gu, Yu
    Wang, Fenfen
    Zheng, Duanyang
    Shen, Kang
    Yuan, Chris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (02): : 227 - 237
  • [6] Research Progress on Interfaces of All-Solid-State Batteries
    Wang, Han
    An, Hanwen
    Shan, Hongmei
    Zhao, Lei
    Wang, Jiajun
    ACTA PHYSICO-CHIMICA SINICA, 2021, 37 (11)
  • [7] All-solid-state interpenetrating network polymer electrolytes for long cycle life of lithium metal batteries
    Tong, Yongfen
    Lyu, Hailong
    Xu, Yuzhong
    Thapaliya, Bishnu Prasad
    Li, Peipei
    Sun, Xiao-Guang
    Dai, Sheng
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A, 2018, 6 (30) : 14847 - 14855
  • [8] Sensitivity Analysis and Joint Estimation of Parameters and States for All-Solid-State Batteries
    Deng, Zhongwei
    Hu, Xiaosong
    Lin, Xianke
    Kim, Youngki
    Li, Jiacheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION, 2021, 7 (03) : 1314 - 1323
  • [9] Comparative sustainability assessment of lithium-ion, lithium-sulfur, and all-solid-state traction batteries
    Popien, Jan-Linus
    Thies, Christian
    Barke, Alexander
    Spengler, Thomas S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (04): : 462 - 477
  • [10] Transport and mechanical aspects of all-solid-state lithium batteries
    Deysher, Grayson
    Ridley, Phillip
    Ham, So-Yeon
    Doux, Jean-Marie
    Chen, Yu-Ting
    Wu, Erik A.
    Tan, Darren H. S.
    Cronk, Ashley
    Jang, Jihyun
    Meng, Ying Shirley
    MATERIALS TODAY PHYSICS, 2022, 24