Life Cycle Assessment and resource analysis of all-solid-state batteries

被引:85
作者
Troy, Stefanie [1 ]
Schreiber, Andrea [1 ]
Reppert, Thorsten [2 ]
Gehrke, Hans-Gregot [2 ]
Finsterbusch, Martin [2 ]
Uhlenbruck, Sven [2 ]
Stenzel, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Syst Anal & Technol Eva, D-52425 Julich, Germany
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich, Inst Energy & Climate Res Mat Synth & Proc IEK 1, D-52425 Julich, Germany
关键词
All-solid-state battery; Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Upscaling effects; Resource analysis; LITHIUM-ION BATTERY; ENERGY-STORAGE SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; PHASE-STABILITY; CONDUCTIVITY; LI7LA3ZR2O12; CRITICALITY; METAL; ELECTROLYTES; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.064
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this investigation the environmental impacts of the manufacturing processes of a new all-solid-state battery (SSB) concept in a pouch bag housing were assessed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology for the first time. To do so, the different production steps were investigated in detail, based on actual laboratory scale production processes. All in- and outputs regarding material and energy flows were collected and assessed. As LCA investigations of products in an early state of research and development usually result in comparatively higher results than those of mature technologies in most impact categories, potential future improvements of production processes and efficiency were considered by adding two concepts to the investigation. Apart from the laboratory production which depicts the current workflow, an idealized laboratory production and a possible industrial production were portrayed as well. The results indicate that electricity consumption plays a big role due to a lot of high temperature production steps. It needs to be improved for future industrial production. Also enhanced battery performance can strongly influence the results. Overall the laboratory scale results indeed improve strongly when assuming a careful use of resources, which will likely be a predominant target for industrial production. These findings therefore highlight hotspots and give improvement targets for future developments. It can also be deducted, that a comparison to the results of competing technologies that have already reached a commercial stage is not recommended for early LCAs. To round things off a resource analysis was also conducted. It identifies the usage of lanthanum, lithium and zirconium oxide as critical, especially when taking laboratory production as a base. When looking at the scale up to industrial production parameters, lanthanum and lithium remain critical, zirconium oxide not. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 767
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Amereller M, 2014, PROGR SOLID STATE CH
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INT REF LIF CYCL DAT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 10 SWISS CTR LIF CYC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ASSESS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, REP CRIT RAW MAT EU
[6]   Building better batteries [J].
Armand, M. ;
Tarascon, J. -M. .
NATURE, 2008, 451 (7179) :652-657
[7]   Li-ion battery recycling and cobalt flow analysis in Japan [J].
Asari, Misuzu ;
Sakai, Shin-Ichi .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2013, 81 :52-59
[8]   A short review of failure mechanisms of lithium metal and lithiated graphite anodes in liquid electrolyte solutions [J].
Aurbach, D ;
Zinigrad, E ;
Cohen, Y ;
Teller, H .
SOLID STATE IONICS, 2002, 148 (3-4) :405-416
[9]   The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework [J].
Bauer, Christian ;
Hofer, Johannes ;
Althaus, Hans-Joerg ;
Del Duce, Andrea ;
Simons, Andrew .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 157 :871-883
[10]  
Bruce PG, 2012, NAT MATER, V11, P19, DOI [10.1038/nmat3191, 10.1038/NMAT3191]