Detection of Aggressive Primary Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT Using Multimodality Fusion Techniques

被引:72
|
作者
Piert, Morand [1 ]
Park, Hyunjin [1 ]
Khan, Asra [1 ]
Siddiqui, Javed [2 ]
Hussain, Hero [1 ]
Chenevert, Thomas [1 ]
Wood, David [3 ]
Johnson, Timothy [4 ]
Shah, Rajal B. [2 ]
Meyer, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Pathol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
C-11-choline; PET/CT; PET/MRI; primary prostate cancer; image fusion; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CHOLINE KINASE; GLEASON SCORE; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; TUMOR; PROLIFERATION; METABOLISM; MANAGEMENT; MARKERS;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.109.063396
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to assess whether C-11-choline PET/CT could identify high-risk primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Methods: C-11-choline PET/CT and transpelvic MRI were performed in 14 patients with untreated localized primary adenocarcinoma of the prostate, followed by radical prostatectomy as a form of primary monotherapy within 14 d of in vivo imaging. To allow accurate coregistration of whole-mount histology with in vivo imaging, additional ex vivo MR images of the prostatectomy specimen were obtained. Nonlinear 3-dimensional image deformations were used for registrations of PET/CT, MRI, and histology. Volumes of interest from tumor and benign tissue were defined on the basis of histology and were transferred into coregistered C-11-choline PET/CT volumes to calculate the mean (T-(mean)/B) and maximum (T-(max)/B) ratio of tumor to benign prostate background. On the basis of MIB-1/Ki-67 expression in tumor tissues represented on a tissue microarray, we assessed whether C-11-choline uptake correlated with local Gleason score and tumor proliferation. Results: Histology confirmed 42 tumor nodules with Gleason scores between 3 + 2 and 4 + 4, with volumes ranging from 0.03 to 12.6 cm(3). T-(mean)/B (P < 0.01) and T-(max)/B (P < 0.001) ratios were significantly increased in high-Gleason score (>= 4 + 3) lesions versus 3 + 4 and lower disease but failed to distinguish between 3 + 4 disease versus 3 + 3 and lower. T-(mean)/B and T-(max)/B ratios were significantly increased in tumors with an MIB-1/Ki-67 labeling index greater than or equal to 5% (P < 0.01). Conclusion: On the basis of our preliminary data using ratios of tumor to benign prostate background, C-11-choline preferentially identified aggressive primary prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1585 / 1593
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 18F-Choline, 11C-choline and 11C-acetate PET/CT: comparative analysis for imaging prostate cancer patients
    Brogsitter, Claudia
    Zoephel, Klaus
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S18 - S27
  • [22] Localization of Parathyroid Adenoma by 11C-Choline PET/CT
    Orevi, Marina
    Freedman, Nanette
    Mishani, Eyal
    Bocher, Moshe
    Jacobson, Orit
    Krausz, Yodphat
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 39 (12) : 1033 - 1038
  • [23] Imaging primary prostate cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT: relation to tumour stage, Gleason score and biomarkers of biologic aggressiveness
    Chen, Ji
    Zhao, Yong
    Li, Xin
    Sun, Peng
    Wang, Muwen
    Wang, Ridong
    Jin, Xunbo
    RADIOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 46 (03) : 179 - 188
  • [24] Comparison of 68Ga-labelled PSMA-11 and 11C-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT
    Johannes Schwenck
    Hansjoerg Rempp
    Gerald Reischl
    Stephan Kruck
    Arnulf Stenzl
    Konstantin Nikolaou
    Christina Pfannenberg
    Christian la Fougère
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2017, 44 : 92 - 101
  • [25] Comparison of 68Ga-labelled PSMA-11 and 11C-choline in the detection of prostate cancer metastases by PET/CT
    Schwenck, Johannes
    Rempp, Hansjoerg
    Reischl, Gerald
    Kruck, Stephan
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Pfannenberg, Christina
    la Fougere, Christian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 (01) : 92 - 101
  • [26] Preoperative Detection of Prostate Cancer: a Comparison With 11C-Choline PET, 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET and MR Imaging
    Watanabe, Haruo
    Kanematsu, Masayuki
    Kondo, Hiroshi
    Kako, Nobuo
    Yamamoto, Naoki
    Yamada, Toru
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Hoshi, Hiroaki
    Bae, Kyongtae T.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (05) : 1151 - 1156
  • [27] Does 11C-choline PET-CT contribute to multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer localisation?
    Van den Bergh, L.
    Isebaert, S.
    Koole, M.
    Oyen, R.
    Joniau, S.
    Lerut, E.
    Deroose, C. M.
    De Keyzer, F.
    Van Poppel, H.
    Haustermans, K.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2013, 189 (09) : 789 - 795
  • [28] Liver metastases from prostate cancer at 11C-Choline PET/CT: a multicenter, retrospective analysis
    Ghedini, Pietro
    Bossert, I.
    Zanoni, L.
    Ceci, F.
    Graziani, T.
    Castellucci, P.
    Ambrosini, V.
    Massari, F.
    Nobili, E.
    Melotti, B.
    Musto, A.
    Zoboli, S.
    Antunovic, L.
    Kirienko, M.
    Chiti, A.
    Mosconi, C.
    Ardizzoni, A.
    Golfieri, R.
    Fanti, S.
    Nanni, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 (05) : 751 - 758
  • [29] Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT for Treatment Planning, Response Assessment, and Prognosis
    Ceci, Francesco
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Mapelli, Paola
    Incerti, Elena
    Picchio, Maria
    Fanti, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 : 49S - 54S
  • [30] 11C-Choline PET/CT in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel
    Ceci, Francesco
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Graziani, Tiziano
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Renzi, Riccardo
    Borghesi, Marco
    Di Tullio, Piergiorgio
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Ardizzoni, Andrea
    Fanti, Stefano
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 (01) : 84 - 91