DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN LOW-DOSE CT FOR URINARY STONE DISEASE: ADDED VALUE OF AUTOMATIC TUBE CURRENT MODULATION AND ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES

被引:8
作者
Soenen, Olivier [1 ]
Balliauw, Christophe [1 ]
Oyen, Raymond [1 ,2 ]
Zanca, Federica [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Radiol, Univ Hosp Leuven, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Imaging & Pathol, Univ Hosp Leuven, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; UNENHANCED MULTIDETECTOR CT; ABDOMINAL CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; HELICAL CT; UROLITHIASIS; REDUCTION; URETEROLITHIASIS; 50-PERCENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncw133
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare dose and image quality (IQ) of a baseline low-dose computed tomography (CT) (fix mAs) vs. an ultra-low-dose CT (automatic tube current modulation, ATCM) in patients with suspected urinary stone disease and to assess the added value of iterative reconstruction. CT examination was performed on 193 patients (103 baseline lowdose, 90 ultra-low-dose). Filtered back projection (FBP) was used for both protocols, and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) was used for the ultra-low-dose protocol only. Dose and ureter stones information were collected for both protocols. Subjective IQ was assessed by two radiologists scoring noise, visibility of the ureter and overall IQ. Objective IQ (contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR) was assessed for the ultra-low-dose protocol only (FBP and SAFIRE). The ultra-low-dose protocol (ATCM) showed a 22% decrease in mean effective dose (p < 0.001) and improved visibility of the pelvic ureter (p = 0.02). CNR was higher for SAFIRE (p < 0.0001). SAFIRE improves the objective IQ, but not the subjective IQ for the chosen clinical task.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 249
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AAPM Task Group 204, 2011, 204 AAPM TASK GROUP
[2]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[3]   Urinary Calculi: Radiation Dose Reduction of 50% and 75% at CT-Effect on Sensitivity [J].
Ciaschini, Michael W. ;
Remer, Erick M. ;
Baker, Mark E. ;
Lieber, Michael ;
Herts, Brian R. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) :105-111
[4]   CT Radiation Dose: What Can You Do Right Now in Your Practice? [J].
Coakley, Fergus V. ;
Gould, Robert ;
Yeh, Benjamin M. ;
Arenson, Ronald L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) :619-625
[5]   Unenhanced helical CT for renal colic - is the radiation dose justifiable? [J].
Denton, ERE ;
Mackenzie, A ;
Greenwell, T ;
Popert, R ;
Rankin, SC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 54 (07) :444-447
[6]   Low-Dose CT With Automatic Tube Current Modulation, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Low Tube Voltage for the Diagnosis of Renal Colic: Impact of Body Mass Index [J].
Gervaise, Alban ;
Naulet, Pierre ;
Beuret, Florence ;
Henry, Christelle ;
Pernin, Matthieu ;
Portron, Yann ;
Lapierre-Combes, Marie .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (03) :553-560
[7]   Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain [J].
Hamm, M ;
Knöpfle, E ;
Wartenberg, S ;
Wawroschek, F ;
Weckermann, D ;
Harzmann, R .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) :1687-1691
[8]   CT of Urolithiasis: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Using Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques [J].
Hansmann, Jan ;
Schoenberg, Gita M. ;
Brix, Gunnar ;
Henzler, Thomas ;
Meyer, Mathias ;
Attenberger, Ulrike I. ;
Schoenberg, Stefan O. ;
Fink, Christian .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) :1162-1167
[9]   Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at CT: Feasibility Study [J].
Hara, Amy K. ;
Paden, Robert G. ;
Silva, Alvin C. ;
Kujak, Jennifer L. ;
Lawder, Holly J. ;
Pavlicek, William .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) :764-771
[10]   Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: Comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques [J].
Heneghan, JP ;
McGuire, KA ;
Leder, RA ;
DeLong, DM ;
Yoshizumi, T ;
Nelson, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :575-580