Confounding by drug formulary restriction in pharmacoepidemiologic research

被引:6
|
作者
Filion, Kristian B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Eberg, Maria [1 ]
Ernst, Pierre [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, 3755 Cote Ste Catherine,Suite H4-16-1, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
confounding; bias; drug formulary restrictions; pharmacoepidemiology; EXPOSURE MISCLASSIFICATION; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA; COHORT; RISK; ADJUSTMENT; MEDICATION; PNEUMONIA; COVERAGE; ICD-9-CM;
D O I
10.1002/pds.3923
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
PurposeThe potential consequences of confounding due to drug formulary restrictions in pharmacoepidemiologic research remain incompletely understood. Our objective was to illustrate this potential bias using the example of fluticasone/salmeterol combination therapy, an oral inhaler used to treat asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, whose use is restricted in the province of Quebec, Canada. MethodsWe identified all new users of fluticasone/salmeterol in Quebec's administrative databases and classified those who received their initial dispensing of fluticasone/salmeterol between 1 September 1999 and 30 September 2003 as users from the liberal period and those who received it between 1 January 2004 and 31 October 2006 as users from the restricted period. The primary outcome was time to first hospitalization for respiratory causes within 12months of cohort entry. ResultsOur cohort included 72154 new users from the liberal period and 5058 from the restricted period. Compared with use during the liberal period, use during the restricted period was associated with an increased rate of hospitalization for respiratory causes (crude hazard ratio [HR]=1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.32, 1.51). Subsequent adjustment for age, sex, and hospitalization for respiratory causes in the previous year attenuated the association (HR=1.05, 95%CI=0.98, 1.12). Further adjustment for other potential confounders resulted in a lower rate during the restricted period (HR=0.78, 95%CI=0.73, 0.83). ConclusionsFormulary restrictions can result in substantial and unexpected confounding and should be considered during the design and analysis of pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 286
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extreme restriction design as a method for reducing confounding by indication in pharmacoepidemiologic research
    Secrest, Matthew H.
    Platt, Robert W.
    Dormuth, Colin R.
    Chateau, Dan
    Targownik, Laura
    Nie, Rui
    Doyle, Carla M.
    Dell'Aniello, Sophie
    Filion, Kristian B.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 26 - 34
  • [2] Restriction of Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohorts to Initiators of Medications in Unrelated Preventive Drug Classes to Reduce Confounding by Frailty in Older Adults
    Zhang, Henry T.
    McGrath, Leah J.
    Ellis, Alan R.
    Wyss, Richard
    Lund, Jennifer L.
    Sturmer, Til
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 188 (07) : 1371 - 1382
  • [3] Use of prescription drug samples in the US and implications for pharmacoepidemiologic research: a systematic search of the literature
    Acton, Emily K.
    Hennessy, Sean
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 541 - 551
  • [4] Controlling confounding when studying large pharmacoepidemiologic databases: A case study of the two-stage sampling design
    Collet, JP
    Schaubel, D
    Hanley, J
    Sharpe, C
    Boivin, JF
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 9 (03) : 309 - 315
  • [5] Why do covariates defined by International Classification of Diseases codes fail to remove confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies among seniors?
    Jackson, Michael L.
    Nelson, Jennifer C.
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2011, 20 (08) : 858 - 865
  • [6] Use of sensitivity analyses to assess uncontrolled confounding from unmeasured variables in observational, active comparator pharmacoepidemiologic studies: a systematic review
    Latour, Chase D.
    Delgado, Megan
    Su, I-Hsuan
    Wiener, Catherine
    Acheampong, Clement O.
    Poole, Charles
    Edwards, Jessie K.
    Quinto, Kenneth
    Sturmer, Til
    Lund, Jennifer L.
    Li, Jie
    Lopez, Nahleen
    Concato, John
    Funk, Michele Jonsson
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 194 (02) : 524 - 535
  • [7] The importance and implications of comparator selection in pharmacoepidemiologic research
    D'Arcy, Monica
    Sturmer, Til
    Lund, Jennifer L.
    CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 5 (03) : 272 - 283
  • [8] Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners
    Roy, Jason
    Mitra, Nandita
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (03) : 277 - 282
  • [9] The importance and implications of comparator selection in pharmacoepidemiologic research
    Monica D’Arcy
    Til Stürmer
    Jennifer L. Lund
    Current Epidemiology Reports, 2018, 5 : 272 - 283
  • [10] Minimizing Bias Due to Confounding by Indication in Comparative Effectiveness Research The Importance of Restriction
    Psaty, Bruce M.
    Siscovick, David S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 304 (08): : 897 - 898