Polarities of the Human and Divine: Aquinas and Schmitt on Political Theology

被引:6
作者
McCormick, William [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 3750 Lindell Blvd, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/ajps.12608
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The investigations of Carl Schmitt yielded an influential but partial recovery of the term "political theology." In this article, I consider Schmitt's tendentious reduction of political theology to a justifying or legitimizing function. I then turn to Aquinas to demonstrate that Christian political theology also offers robust criticism of political life. After laying out three such standards for criticism, I account for why Christian political theology exhibits this deep ambivalence toward political life. The traditions of political theology, I argue, can be understood as attempts to harmonize polar tensions with those traditions. Whereas thinkers like Schmitt and Foucault emphasize one set of polarities against another, Aquinas effects a genuine synthesis. This synthesis should be the task of political theology. I close with notes toward the renewal of political theology.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 105
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1954, C SCHMITT DIALOGUES
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1965, FEM THEOR
[3]  
Appleby R.Soctt., 1999, AMBIVALENCE SACRED
[4]  
Aquinas Thomas., 1920, SUMMA THEOLOGIAE T F
[5]  
Dulles AveryS.J., 2002, MODELS CHURCH
[6]  
Eschmann I.Th., 1949, KINGSHIP DE REGNO
[7]  
Foucault Michel., 1978, SECURITY TERRITORY P
[8]  
Francis, 2015, Encyclical Letter, P1
[9]  
Gray Phillip W., 2007, Humanitas, V20, P175, DOI DOI 10.5840/HUMANITAS2007201/210
[10]  
Halbertal M, 2017, BEGINNING OF POLITICS: POWER IN THE BIBLICAL BOOK OF SAMUEL, P1, DOI 10.1515/9781400884896