Exploring the key challenges facing company secretaries in a two-tier board context

被引:3
作者
Peij, Stefan [1 ]
Bezemer, Pieter-Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Goveranance Univ, Doorn, Netherlands
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Fac Business & Law, Joondalup, Australia
来源
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY | 2021年 / 21卷 / 05期
关键词
Challenges; Two-tier boards; Corporate governance; Interventions; The Netherlands; Company secretaries; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; UNDERSTANDING BOARDS; DIRECTORS; CHAIRS; MATTER;
D O I
10.1108/CG-06-2020-0226
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aims to examine the core challenges facing company secretaries in a two-tier board context. This study focuses on the key factors contributing to these challenges and how company secretaries can effectively address them. Design/methodology/approach An analysis of the narratives provided by 291 Dutch company secretaries in response to a series of open-ended questionnaire questions led to insights into the key challenges company secretaries face in their day-to-day work. Findings Company secretaries perceive a myriad of factors contributing to pressures on their time, the need to work for multiple organizational bodies and the processing of information. They believe process interventions and social interventions are needed to alleviate these issues. Research limitations/implications The research highlights the need to deeply study boards from a holistic and systems point of view that recognizes the various actors, such as the company secretary, and their relationships in a boardroom context. Furthermore, the research shows how the two-tier board model may complicate these relational dynamics owing to the formal separation of decision management from decision control. Practical implications This study identifies various pragmatic ways to address the core challenges facing company secretaries so as to improve their contributions to decision-making at the apex of organizations. Originality/value This study sheds light on an important organizational actor (i.e. the company secretary) that hitherto has received scant attention in the governance literature.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 830
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, ROME INC RISE FALL 1
  • [2] Boardroom Strategic Decision-Making Style: Understanding the Antecedents
    Bailey, Bernard C.
    Peck, Simon I.
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2013, 21 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [3] Inducing Frame-Breaking Insights through Qualitative Research
    Bansal, Pratima
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2013, 21 (02) : 127 - 130
  • [4] The influence of board chairs on director engagement: A case-based exploration of boardroom decision-making
    Bezemer, Pieter-Jan
    Nicholson, Gavin
    Pugliese, Amedeo
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2018, 26 (03) : 219 - 234
  • [5] Power and Paradigms: The Dutch Response to Pressures for Shareholder Value
    Bezemer, Pieter-Jan
    Zajac, Edward J.
    Naumovska, Ivana
    van den Bosch, Frans A. J.
    Volberda, Henk W.
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2015, 23 (01) : 60 - 75
  • [6] How two-tier boards can be more effective
    Bezemer, Pieter-Jan
    Peij, Stefan
    de Kruijs, Laura
    Maassen, Gregory
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2014, 14 (01): : 15 - +
  • [7] Are Boards Designed to Fail? The Implausibility of Effective Board Monitoring
    Boivie, Steven
    Bednar, Michael K.
    Aguilera, Ruth V.
    Andrus, Joel L.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2016, 10 (01) : 319 - 407
  • [8] Davies P., 2014, CORPORATE BOARDS LAW
  • [9] Erismann-Peyer G., 2008, INSIDERS VIEW CORPOR
  • [10] SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL
    FAMA, EF
    JENSEN, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1983, 26 (02) : 301 - 325