Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone-cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee

被引:83
作者
Fripp, Jurgen
Crozier, Stuart
Warfield, Simon K.
Ourselin, Sebastien
机构
[1] CSIRO ICT Ctr, BioMedIA Lab, Autonomous Syst Lab, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Boston, Computat Radiol Lab, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/52/6/005
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The accurate segmentation of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance (MR) images of the knee is important for clinical studies and drug trials into conditions like osteoarthritis. Currently, segmentations are obtained using time-consuming manual or semi-automatic algorithms which have high inter- and intra-observer variabilities. This paper presents an important step towards obtaining automatic and accurate segmentations of the cartilages, namely an approach to automatically segment the bones and extract the bone cartilage interfaces (BCI) in the knee. The segmentation is performed using three-dimensional active shape models, which are initialized using an affine registration to an atlas. The BCI are then extracted using image information and prior knowledge about the likelihood of each point belonging to the interface. The accuracy and robustness of the approach was experimentally validated using an MR database of fat suppressed spoiled gradient recall images. The ( femur, tibia, patella) bone segmentation had a median Dice similarity coefficient of (0.96, 0.96, 0.89) and an average point-to-surface error of 0.16 mm on the BCI. The extracted BCI had a median surface overlap of 0.94 with the real interface, demonstrating its usefulness for subsequent cartilage segmentation or quantitative analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:1617 / 1631
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: Evaluation of precision and accuracy [J].
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Krause, Stefanie J. ;
Ross, Christian J. ;
Krug, Roland ;
Carballido-Gamio, Julio ;
Ozhinsky, Eugene ;
Majumdar, Sharmila ;
Link, Thomas M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :399-406
[2]   Comparison of conventional standing knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing progression of tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis [J].
Cicuttini, FM ;
Hankin, J ;
Jones, G ;
Wluka, A .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2005, 13 (08) :722-727
[3]   ACTIVE SHAPE MODELS - THEIR TRAINING AND APPLICATION [J].
COOTES, TF ;
TAYLOR, CJ ;
COOPER, DH ;
GRAHAM, J .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 1995, 61 (01) :38-59
[4]   Neurospora: a model of model microbes [J].
Davis, RH ;
Perkins, DD .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (05) :397-403
[5]   MEASURES OF THE AMOUNT OF ECOLOGIC ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SPECIES [J].
DICE, LR .
ECOLOGY, 1945, 26 (03) :297-302
[6]   Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment [J].
Eckstein, F. ;
Cicuttini, Flavia M. ;
Raynauld, J. -P. ;
Waterton, J. C. ;
Peterfy, C. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2006, 14 :A46-A75
[7]  
Folkesson J, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3749, P327
[8]  
Fripp J, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3765, P51
[9]  
FRIPP J, 2006, SPIE MED IMAGING, V6141, P622
[10]   New techniques for cartilage imaging: T2 relaxation time and diffusion-weighted MR imaging [J].
Glaser, C .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 43 (04) :641-+