Healthy knee KT1000 measurements of anterior tibial translation have significant variation

被引:13
作者
Klasan, Antonio [1 ]
Putnis, Sven Edward [1 ]
Kandhari, Vikram [1 ]
Oshima, Takeshi [1 ]
Fritsch, Brett Andrew [1 ]
Parker, David Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] Sydney Orthopaed Res Inst, Level 1,445 Victoria Ave, Chatswood, NSW 2067, Australia
关键词
Knee; Arthrometer; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior tibial translation; CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; PATELLAR TENDON; HAMSTRING AUTOGRAFT; KT-1000; ARTHROMETER; FOLLOW-UP; LAXITY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; LACHMAN;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-019-05768-w
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The most commonly used arthrometer for measuring and reporting anterior tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is the KT1000. Reports on its consistency and reproducibility vary in the literature, but it remains the "gold standard". The purpose of this study was to assess agreement of KT1000 measurements in a daily clinical setting. Methods A retrospective analysis of anterior knee translation in the healthy knee of 770 patients over a 17-year time period was performed. In this cohort, a total of 24 investigators performed 1890 measurement sets at 89 Newtons (N), 134N and at maximum manual force (MMax) level. To assess the inter- and intra-observer agreement, the intraclass-correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The "investigator effect" was a difference between two examiners in the same patient and the "device effect'' a difference within one examiner in the same patient. Minimally important difference (MID) was calculated as 0.5 of the standard deviation. Results Thirteen investigators were female, performing 1099 measurements and 11 were male, performing 791 measurements. ICC ranged between 0.558 and 0.644. At the MMax level, male investigators had a higher mm reading than female investigators (p < 0.001). Increased experience did not correlate with a higher ICC. MID ranged between 0.85 and 1.65 mm. Conclusion This study investigated the KT1000 arthrometer in a clinical setting with a large number of investigators. This device delivers moderate agreement of results. Both the device and investigator effect are present. The MMax level has shown the lowest agreement and a dependency on the investigator gender.
引用
收藏
页码:2177 / 2183
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [31] Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging
    Rohman E.M.
    Macalena J.A.
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2016, 9 (2) : 130 - 138
  • [32] Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients
    Samuelsen, Brian T.
    Webster, Kate E.
    Johnson, Nick R.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    Krych, Aaron J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (10) : 2459 - 2468
  • [33] Evaluation of the reproducibility of the KT-1000 arthrometer
    Sernert, N
    Kartus, J
    Köhler, K
    Ejerhed, L
    Karlsson, J
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2001, 11 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [34] Knee-laxity measurements examined by a left-hand- and a right-hand-dominant physiotherapist, in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and healthy controls
    Sernert, Ninni
    Helmers, Janett
    Kartus, Catarina
    Ejerhed, Lars
    Kartus, Juri
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2007, 15 (10) : 1181 - 1186
  • [35] Patellar Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Similar Femoral and Tibial Fixation Methods
    Taylor, Dean C.
    DeBerardino, Thomas M.
    Nelson, Bradley J.
    Duffey, Michele
    Tenuta, Joachim
    Stoneman, Paul D.
    Sturdivant, Rodney X.
    Mountcastle, Sally
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (10) : 1946 - 1957
  • [36] Twenty-Year Outcome of a Longitudinal Prospective Evaluation of Isolated Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon or Hamstring Autograft
    Thompson, Simon Michael
    Salmon, Lucy J.
    Waller, Alison
    Linklater, James
    Roe, Justin P.
    Pinczewski, Leo A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12) : 3083 - 3094
  • [37] Upper Limb Strength: Study Providing Normative Data for a Clinical Handheld Dynamometer
    Van Harlinger, Wanda
    Blalock, Lori
    Merritt, John L.
    [J]. PM&R, 2015, 7 (02) : 135 - 140
  • [38] Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture
    Wiertsema, S. H.
    van Hooff, H. J. A.
    Migchelsen, L. A. A.
    Steultjens, M. P. M.
    [J]. KNEE, 2008, 15 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [39] REPEATABILITY OF THE KT-1000 ARTHROMETER IN A NORMAL POPULATION
    WROBLE, RR
    VANGINKEL, LA
    GROOD, ES
    NOYES, FR
    SHAFFER, BL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1990, 18 (04) : 396 - 399
  • [40] Re-revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction showed more laxity than revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a minimum 2-year follow-up
    Yoon, Kyoung Ho
    Kim, Jae Ho
    Kwon, Yoo Beom
    Kim, Eung Ju
    Kim, Sang-Gyun
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (06) : 1909 - 1918