Searching for the real sustainable smart city?

被引:9
作者
Webster, C. William R. [1 ]
Leleux, Charles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Stirling Management Sch, Ctr Res Informat Surveillance & Privacy, Stirling, Scotland
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Sustainable smart cities; smart cities; sustainability; citizen participation; eGovernance; LOCAL E-GOVERNMENT; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC-SERVICES; CREATIVE CITIES; UNITED-STATES; SOCIAL MEDIA; COPRODUCTION; TRANSPARENCY; EXPLORATION; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.3233/IP-190132
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The emergence of 'Smart Cities' is a contemporary global phenomenon which is closely aligned to a vision of modern technologically advanced sustainable urban environments. However, public policy and academic discourses differ about what constitutes a city that is either 'smart' or 'sustainable', and assumptions are frequently made about the positive impact of technology and its potential benefit to the environment. Whilst a smart city is not necessarily a sustainable city, the terms 'smart city' and the 'sustainable city' are increasingly being fused together in the concept of the Sustainable Smart City (SSC). This article seeks to explore the conceptual components of the SSC, with a particular focus on the participatory role of the citizen, where this involves the use of new digital technologies. Conventional eGovernment has tended to focus on service delivery rather than engaging citizens in participatory activity, whilst traditional discourses on sustainability focus on environmentalism rather than broader societal sustainability. Sustainability in the context of the SSC is a much wider concept, where the aspiration is also to improve the quality life by engaging citizens in participatory governance, by co-creating sustainability values, and by developing relationships, trust and sustainable mechanisms for ongoing engagement. In this respect, new digital technology is understood according to its transformational potential and the opportunities which it offers to citizens in delivery of services, meaningful participation and of sustainable societal solutions. This article explores the three underlying conceptual pillars of the SCC, namely insights deriving from perspectives associated with (1) sustainability, (2) new technology and (3) participation, where each of these perspectives offers up its own rationale and institutional logic. Here, it is argued, that whilst practice around SSC's differs considerably, the 'real' SSC stands at the nexus of new technology, citizen engagement and sustainable outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 244
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
    Ahvenniemi, Hannele
    Huovila, Aapo
    Pinto-Seppa, Isabel
    Airaksinen, Miimu
    [J]. CITIES, 2017, 60 : 234 - 245
  • [2] Al-Nasrawi Sukaina, 2015, JISTEM J.Inf.Syst. Technol. Manag., V12, P541
  • [3] Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives
    Albino, Vito
    Berardi, Umberto
    Dangelico, Rosa Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 22 (01) : 3 - 21
  • [4] Alford J, 2009, ENGAGING PUBLIC SECTOR CLIENTS: FROM SERVICE-DELIVERY TO CO-PRODUCTION, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230235816
  • [5] Co-Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co-Producers
    Alford, John
    Yates, Sophie
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 75 (02) : 159 - 175
  • [6] Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces
    Angelidou, Margarita
    [J]. CITIES, 2015, 47 : 95 - 106
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, PERSPECT PUBLIC MANA, DOI DOI 10.1093/PPMGOV/GVX017.NO
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1987, COMISSAO MUNDIAL
  • [9] [Anonymous], RISE NETWORK SOC
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, SMART CITIES GOVERNI, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203076224