False-negative MRI breast screening in high-risk women

被引:16
|
作者
Maxwell, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Y. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Hurley, E. [1 ]
Evans, D. G. [1 ,3 ]
Howell, A. [1 ,4 ]
Gadde, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Manchester Hosp, Nightingale Ctr, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Cent Manchester NHS Fdn Trust, MAHSC, Ctr Genom Med, Div Evolut & Genom Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Manchester Canc Res Ctr, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Div Mol & Clin Canc Sci, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
BRCA1; MUTATION; FAMILIAL RISK; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; FEATURES; CARRIERS; AGE; MULTICENTER; SENSITIVITY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To determine the frequency of and reasons for false-negative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in high-risk women undergoing annual screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The family history clinic database was interrogated and women at high risk of breast cancer who had undergone screening MRI and been diagnosed with breast cancer within 2 years of the MRI examination were identified. All available MRI examinations were reviewed and classified by two radiologists. RESULTS: Of 32 women diagnosed with breast cancer, 23 had MRI images available for review. Fourteen were diagnosed at MRI, four at interim mammography, two symptomatically, one incidentally on ultrasound, and two at risk-reducing mastectomy. Ten women (43%) had potentially avoidable delays in diagnosis. The preceding MRIs were classified as false-negative screens in five women (one prevalent, four incident), false-negative assessment in seven and minimal signs in three (three women were assigned dual classifications). Common reasons for diagnostic delay included small enhancing masses that were overlooked, areas of non-mass enhancement that showed little or no change between screens, false reassurance from normal conventional imaging at assessment, and overreliance on short-interval repeat MRI. CONCLUSION: Small enhancing foci, masses, and areas of segmental non-mass enhancement are common MRI features of early breast cancer. Lack of change of non-mass enhancement on serial examinations does not exclude malignancy. Double reading of both screening and assessment examinations is recommended. Ready access to MRI biopsy is essential. Short-interval repeat MRI should be limited to reassessing low suspicion areas likely to be benign glandular enhancement. Annual mammography remains important in these women. (C) 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 216
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk of false-negative findings by FISH in trisomy 21 screening
    Fritz, B
    vanOorschot, B
    Latta, E
    Rehder, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 1996, 200 (05): : 191 - 198
  • [22] False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Friedewald, Sarah M.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Copit, Debra S.
    Barke, Lora D.
    Rose, Stephen L.
    Hayes, Mary K.
    Greer, Linda N.
    Dabbous, Firas M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (02) : 296 - 305
  • [23] Risk Factors for a False-Negative Axillary Ultrasound in Breast Cancer
    Jones, Stacey
    Sharma, Nisha
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 58 - 58
  • [24] The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program
    S. Vreemann
    A. Gubern-Merida
    S. Lardenoije
    P. Bult
    N. Karssemeijer
    K. Pinker
    R. M. Mann
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 323 - 331
  • [25] Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening High-risk Women: Comparison with the Full Clinical Protocol
    Osei, Kendrah, V
    Mehta, Anita K.
    Thigpen, Denise M.
    Rapelyea, Jocelyn
    Friedman, Steven
    Brem, Rachel F.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [26] Erratum to: MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis
    D. Gareth Evans
    Nisha Kesavan
    Yit Lim
    Soujanye Gadde
    Emma Hurley
    Nathalie J. Massat
    Anthony J. Maxwell
    Sarah Ingham
    Rosalind Eeles
    Martin O. Leach
    Anthony Howell
    Stephen W. Duffy
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 147 : 691 - 691
  • [27] Breast MRI Screening of Women with a Prior High-Risk Lesion: Preliminary Results.
    Brennan, S. B.
    Liberman, L.
    Dershaw, D. D.
    Morris, E.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (24) : 707S - 707S
  • [28] Comprehensive screening using breast MRI and ductal lavage in high-risk women.
    Hartman, AR
    Daniel, BL
    Ford, JM
    Chun, NM
    Kingham, KE
    Mills, MA
    Grekowicz, AM
    Jacobs, CD
    Herfkens, RJ
    Nowels, KW
    Dirbas, FM
    Plevritis, SK
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 76 : S152 - S152
  • [29] The frequency of missed breast cancers in women participating in a high-risk MRI screening program
    Vreemann, S.
    Gubern-Merida, A.
    Lardenoije, S.
    Bult, P.
    Karssemeijer, N.
    Pinker, K.
    Mann, R. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (02) : 323 - 331
  • [30] Detected, yet not Diagnosed - Breast Cancer Screening with MRI Mammography in High-Risk Women
    Heil, Joerg
    Czink, Elena
    Schipp, Anne
    Sohn, Christof
    Junkermann, Hans
    Golatta, Michael
    BREAST CARE, 2012, 7 (03) : 236 - 239