False-negative MRI breast screening in high-risk women

被引:18
作者
Maxwell, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Y. Y. [1 ,2 ]
Hurley, E. [1 ]
Evans, D. G. [1 ,3 ]
Howell, A. [1 ,4 ]
Gadde, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Manchester Hosp, Nightingale Ctr, Southmoor Rd, Manchester M23 9LT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Hlth Sci, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Cent Manchester NHS Fdn Trust, MAHSC, Ctr Genom Med, Div Evolut & Genom Sci, Oxford Rd, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Manchester Canc Res Ctr, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Div Mol & Clin Canc Sci, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
BRCA1; MUTATION; FAMILIAL RISK; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; FEATURES; CARRIERS; AGE; MULTICENTER; SENSITIVITY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2016.10.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To determine the frequency of and reasons for false-negative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations in high-risk women undergoing annual screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The family history clinic database was interrogated and women at high risk of breast cancer who had undergone screening MRI and been diagnosed with breast cancer within 2 years of the MRI examination were identified. All available MRI examinations were reviewed and classified by two radiologists. RESULTS: Of 32 women diagnosed with breast cancer, 23 had MRI images available for review. Fourteen were diagnosed at MRI, four at interim mammography, two symptomatically, one incidentally on ultrasound, and two at risk-reducing mastectomy. Ten women (43%) had potentially avoidable delays in diagnosis. The preceding MRIs were classified as false-negative screens in five women (one prevalent, four incident), false-negative assessment in seven and minimal signs in three (three women were assigned dual classifications). Common reasons for diagnostic delay included small enhancing masses that were overlooked, areas of non-mass enhancement that showed little or no change between screens, false reassurance from normal conventional imaging at assessment, and overreliance on short-interval repeat MRI. CONCLUSION: Small enhancing foci, masses, and areas of segmental non-mass enhancement are common MRI features of early breast cancer. Lack of change of non-mass enhancement on serial examinations does not exclude malignancy. Double reading of both screening and assessment examinations is recommended. Ready access to MRI biopsy is essential. Short-interval repeat MRI should be limited to reassessing low suspicion areas likely to be benign glandular enhancement. Annual mammography remains important in these women. (C) 2016 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 216
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors [J].
Boetes, C ;
Strijk, SP ;
Holland, R ;
Barentsz, JO ;
VanderSluis, RF ;
Ruijs, JHJ .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (08) :1231-1234
[2]  
Brennan Sandra B, 2012, Eur J Radiol, V81 Suppl 1, pS10, DOI 10.1016/S0720-048X(12)70004-9
[3]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
[4]   Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers [J].
Chubiz, Jessica E. Cott ;
Lee, Janie M. ;
Gilmore, Michael E. ;
Kong, Chung Y. ;
Lowry, Kathryn P. ;
Halpern, Elkan F. ;
McMahon, Pamela M. ;
Ryan, Paula D. ;
Gazelle, G. Scott .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (06) :1266-1276
[5]   Reporting and management of breast lesions detected using MRI [J].
Dall, B. J. G. ;
Vinnicombe, S. ;
Gilbert, F. J. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 66 (12) :1120-1128
[6]   Intensive breast screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers is associated with reduced breast cancer specific and all cause mortality [J].
Evans, D. G. ;
Harkness, E. F. ;
Howell, A. ;
Wilson, M. ;
Hurley, E. ;
Holmen, M. M. ;
Tharmaratnam, K. U. ;
Hagen, A. I. ;
Lim, Y. ;
Maxwell, A. J. ;
Moller, P. .
HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 14
[7]   MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis [J].
Gareth, Evans D. ;
Nisha, Kesavan ;
Yit, Lim ;
Soujanye, Gadde ;
Emma, Hurley ;
Massat, Nathalie J. ;
Maxwell, Anthony J. ;
Sarah, Ingham ;
Rosalind, Eeles ;
Leach, Martin O. ;
Anthony, Howell ;
Stephen, Duffy .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 145 (03) :663-672
[8]   Patterns of Nonmasslike Enhancement at Screening Breast MR Imaging of High-Risk Premenopausal Women [J].
Giess, Catherine S. ;
Raza, Sughra ;
Birdwell, Robyn L. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2013, 33 (05) :1343-1360
[9]   Cancers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Carriers and in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: MR Imaging and Mammographic Features [J].
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Warren, Ruth M. L. ;
Kwan-Lim, Gek ;
Thompson, Deborah J. ;
Eeles, Ros A. ;
Evans, D. Gareth ;
Leach, Martin O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 252 (02) :358-368
[10]   Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breasts: Review of MR Imaging Features [J].
Greenwood, Heather I. ;
Heller, Samantha L. ;
Kim, Sungheon ;
Sigmund, Eric E. ;
Shaylor, Sara D. ;
Moy, Linda .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2013, 33 (06) :1569-1588