Effects of technology-enhanced constructivist learning on science achievement of students with different cognitive styles

被引:6
作者
Firat, Esra Acikgul [1 ]
Koksal, Mustafa Serdar [2 ]
Bahsi, Alaattin [3 ]
机构
[1] Adiyaman Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Sci & Math Educ, Adiyaman, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Special Educ, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Minist Natl Educ, Bingol, Turkey
关键词
Science education; Cognitive styles; Field dependence; independence; Technology enhanced-learning; WEB; 2.0; FRAMEWORK; TEACHERS; DESIGN; TOOLS; PERSPECTIVES; EDUCATION; LEARNERS; TEXT;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-021-10427-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of technology-enhanced constructivist learning on science achievement of seventh-grade students with different cognitive styles. Cognitive styles of the students are examined within the frame of Witkin et al. (1977) in terms of field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. The quantitative study was conducted using an experimental method with a factorial design that is a modification of the pretest-posttest control group design. The sample of the study consists of 39 seventh-grade students (19 students in the experimental group and 20 students in the control group). Strength and Energy Achievement Test and The Embedded Figures Test (EFT) were used to collect the data. The results of this study show that there is no statistically significant difference between the mean score ranks of experimental and control groups for the pretest and posttest scores of students. Furthermore, there is no significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the field independent students in both experimental and control groups but there are significant differences between pretest and posttest scores of the field dependent students. Suggestions were presented by the results obtained from the research.
引用
收藏
页码:3659 / 3676
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Learning styles: Considerations for technology enhanced item design [J].
Adkins, Deborah ;
Guerreiro, Meg .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 49 (03) :574-583
[2]   Neuroscience Perspectives for Science and Mathematics Learning in Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments [J].
Anderson, O. Roger ;
Love, Bradley C. ;
Tsai, Meng-Jung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2014, 12 (03) :467-474
[3]   Examining the effects of text-only and text-and-visual instructional materials on the achievement of field-dependent and field-independent learners during problem-solving with modeling software [J].
Angeli, C ;
Valanides, N .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 52 (04) :23-36
[4]   Field dependence-independence and instructional-design effects on learners' performance with a computer-modeling tool [J].
Angeli, Charoula ;
Valanides, Nicos ;
Kirschner, Paul .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 25 (06) :1355-1366
[5]   The relationship between pre-service science teachers' cognitive styles and their cognitive structures about technology [J].
Aydin, Fatih .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 33 (01) :88-110
[6]  
Ayres P., 2014, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, P206, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781139547369.011, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.011]
[7]  
Bahar M., 2003, Hacettepe Univ. J. Educ, V24, P26
[8]   Students' learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning [J].
Balakrishnan, Vimala ;
Lay, Gan Chin .
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2016, 33 (03) :808-821
[9]   A framework for Web 2.0 learning design [J].
Bower, Matt ;
Hedberg, John ;
Kuswara, Andreas .
EDUCATIONAL MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 47 (03) :177-198
[10]   An Examination of the Changes in Science Teaching Orientations and Technology-Enhanced Tools for Student Learning in the Context of Professional Development [J].
Campbell, Todd ;
Zuwallack, Rebecca ;
Longhurst, Max ;
Shelton, Brett E. ;
Wolf, Paul G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2014, 36 (11) :1815-1848