THE IMPACT OF VOLATILITY DERIVATIVES ON S&P500 VOLATILITY

被引:7
作者
Dawson, Paul [1 ]
Staikouras, Sotiris K. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Coll Business Adm, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] City Univ London, Cass Business Sch, London EC1V 0HB, England
[3] ALBA Grad Business Sch, Athens, Greece
关键词
STOCK-PRICE VOLATILITY; CASH MARKET VOLATILITY; GNMA SECURITIES; FUTURES MARKET; INDEX FUTURES; MODELS; STABILITY; RETURNS; NEWS;
D O I
10.1002/fut.20424
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study investigates whether the newly cultivated platform of volatility derivatives has altered the volatility of the underlying S&P500 index. The findings suggest that the onset of the volatility derivatives trading has lowered the volatility of both the cash market volatility and the cash market index, and significantly reduced the impact of shocks to volatility. When big sudden events hit financial markets, however, the volatility of volatility seems to elevate in the U.S. equity market as a result of increased global correlations. Regardless of the period under examination and the estimator employed, long-run volatility persistence is present. The latter drops significantly when the credit crunch period is excluded from the post-event date sample period. The correlation between the broad equity index and the return volatility remains low, which in turn strengthens the role of volatility derivatives to facilitate portfolio diversification. The analysis also shows that volatility is mean reverting, whereas market data support the impact of information asymmetries on conditional volatility. In the post-event date phase, no asymmetries are found when the recent crisis is not accounted for. Finally, comparisons with other international equity indices, with no volatility derivatives listed, unveil that these indices exhibit higher volatility and slower recovery from shocks than the S&P500 index. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 29:1190-1213, 2009
引用
收藏
页码:1190 / 1213
页数:24
相关论文
共 58 条
[31]  
Friedman Milton, 1953, ESSAYS POSITIVE EC
[32]  
FROEWISS KC, 1978, EC REV FEDERAL RESER, V7, P20
[33]  
GANGAHAR A, 2006, FINANCIAL TIMES 0524
[34]   ON THE RELATION BETWEEN THE EXPECTED VALUE AND THE VOLATILITY OF THE NOMINAL EXCESS RETURN ON STOCKS [J].
GLOSTEN, LR ;
JAGANNATHAN, R ;
RUNKLE, DE .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1993, 48 (05) :1779-1801
[36]   S-AND-P 500 CASH STOCK-PRICE VOLATILITIES [J].
HARRIS, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1989, 44 (05) :1155-1175
[37]  
Kalotychou E, 2009, CH CRC FINANC SER, P3
[38]  
Koutmos G, 1996, J FUTURES MARKETS, V16, P55, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9934(199602)16:1<55::AID-FUT3>3.0.CO
[39]  
2-G
[40]  
McKenzie MD, 2001, J FUTURES MARKETS, V21, P237, DOI 10.1002/1096-9934(200103)21:3<237::AID-FUT3>3.0.CO