Validation of semiautomatic measurement of the extent of breast tumors using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

被引:26
|
作者
Alderliesten, Tanja
Schlief, Angelique
Peterse, Johannes
Loo, Claudette
Teertstra, Hendrik
Muller, Sara
Gilhuijs, Kenneth
机构
[1] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
breast cancer; tumor; extent; segmentation; contrast-enhanced MRI;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000248849.99014.7e
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether the semiautomatic measurement of breast-tumor extent using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) decreases measurement variation compared with manual evaluation and increases precision with respect to tumor extent measured at histopathology. Materials and Methods: Forty-three patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy for 46 tumors were consecutively included. Extended histopathology analysis was performed on the excision specimens. Two experienced breast-MR radiologists independently manually assessed the largest diameter of the tumors at preoperative CE-MRI. Two observers used a semiautomatic segmentation technique to independently obtain the largest diameter and the volume of the tumors. Results: Semiautomatic volumetric measurement of tumor volume was more accurately correlated with histopathology (adjusted R-square 0.84 and 0.81) compared with conventional measurement (adjusted R-square 0.56 and 0.70) and semiautomatic measurement (adjusted R-square 0.63 and 0.60) of the largest diameter of the tumor. The interobserver variability between the volumetric measurements was significantly smaller than the interobserver variability between the largest-diameter measurements of tumor extent obtained by the radiologists (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Semiautomatic volumetric measurement of breast-tumor extent at CE-MRI provides a more accurate assessment of tumor extent with respect to histopathology and reduces measurement variation compared with manual assessment of the largest diameter. Automated volumetric measurement thus provides potential for increased precision in establishing response to treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting the Histology of Small Renal Masses Using Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kim, Jae Heon
    Bae, Jae Hyun
    Lee, Kwang Woo
    Kim, Min Eui
    Park, Seong Jin
    Park, Jae Young
    UROLOGY, 2012, 80 (04) : 872 - 876
  • [42] Imaging of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
    Lee, Sandy C.
    Tchelepi, Hisham
    Khadem, Nasim
    Desai, Bhushan
    Yamashita, Mary
    Hovanessian-Larsen, Linda
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2022, 38 (01) : 2 - 12
  • [43] Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging and semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in salivary gland tumors
    Gokce, Erkan
    Beyhan, Murat
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 15 (01): : 20 - 31
  • [44] Measuring tumor perfusion in control and treated murine tumors - Correlation of microbubble contrast-enhanced Sonography to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
    Niermann, Kenneth J.
    Fleischer, Arthur C.
    Huamani, Jessica
    Yankeelov, Thomas E.
    Kim, Dong W.
    Wilson, Wendy D.
    Hallahan, Dennis E.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (06) : 749 - 756
  • [45] Predictive Value of the Time–Intensity Curves on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lymphatic Spreading in Breast Cancer
    Shuhei Komatsu
    Chol Joo Lee
    Daisuke Ichikawa
    Takashi Hamashima
    Noriaki Morofuji
    Koichi Shirono
    Yohei Hosokawa
    Harumi Okabe
    Hideaki Kurioka
    Hisakazu Yamagishi
    Takahiro Oka
    Surgery Today, 2005, 35 : 720 - 724
  • [46] Radiomics for Tumor Characterization in Breast Cancer Patients: A Feasibility Study Comparing Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Marino, Maria Adele
    Leithner, Doris
    Sung, Janice
    Avendano, Daly
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Pinker, Katja
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (07)
  • [47] Assessing response in breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Are signal intensity–time curves adequate?
    David K. Woolf
    Anwar R. Padhani
    N. Jane Taylor
    Andrew Gogbashian
    Sonia P. Li
    Mark J. Beresford
    Mei-Lin Ah-See
    James Stirling
    David J. Collins
    Andreas Makris
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 147 : 335 - 343
  • [48] Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography as Breast Imaging Modality Compared to Standard Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Bartolovic, Nina
    Peterko, Ana Car
    Avirovic, Manuela
    Ritosa, Doris Segota
    Dujmic, Emina Grgurevic
    Zujic, Petra Valkovic
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (14)
  • [49] Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7T for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Characterization
    Ochoa-Albiztegui, R. Elena
    Sevilimedu, Varadan
    Horvat, Joao, V
    Thakur, Sunitha B.
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    Morris, Elizabeth A.
    Reiner, Jeffrey S.
    Pinker, Katja
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (12) : 1 - 17
  • [50] Quantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict lymphovascular invasion and survival outcome in breast cancer
    Lai, Tianfu
    Chen, Xiaofeng
    Yang, Zhiqi
    Huang, Ruibin
    Liao, Yuting
    Chen, Xiangguang
    Dai, Zhuozhi
    CANCER IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)