A mechanistic molecular test of the plant-sanction hypothesis in legume-rhizobia mutualism

被引:10
作者
Marco, Diana E. [1 ]
Perez-Arnedo, Rebeca [2 ]
Hidalgo-Perea, Angeles [3 ]
Olivares, Jose [2 ]
Ruiz-Sainz, Jose E. [3 ]
Sanjuan, Juan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Lab Ecol Matemat, Area Prod Organ, Fac Ciencias Agropecuarias, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
[2] CSIC, Dept Microbiol Suelo & Sistemas Simbiot, Estac Expt Zaidin, E-18008 Granada, Spain
[3] Univ Seville, Dept Microbiol, Fac Biol, E-41012 Seville, Spain
来源
ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY | 2009年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
Legume-rhizobia mutualism; Plant-host sanctions; Mechanistic molecular test; COOPERATION; EVOLUTION; NODULATION; COMPETITION; JAPONICUM; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.actao.2009.06.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The origin and persistence of mutualism is difficult to explain because of the widespread occurrence of exploitative, 'cheating' partners. As a policing strategy stabilising intraspecific cooperation, host sanctions against non-N(2) fixing, cheating symbionts have been proposed to stabilise mutualism in legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Mechanism of penalisations would include decreased nodular rhizobial viability and/or early nodule senescence. We tested these potential mechanisms of penalisations in split-root experiments using two soybean varieties and two rhizobial strains, a cooperative, normal N(2)-fixing strain and an isogenic non-fixing derivative. We found no differences in the number of viable rhizobia recovered from nodules and no differential expression of a nodular senescence molecular marker. Thus, our results do not support the hypothesis of plant sanctions acting against cheating rhizobia in our experimental conditions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 667
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Isolation of a molecular marker of soybean nodule senescence [J].
Alesandrini, F ;
Frendo, P ;
Puppo, A ;
Hérouart, D .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2003, 41 (08) :727-732
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, MANUAL PRACTICAL STU
[4]   THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
AXELROD, R ;
HAMILTON, WD .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4489) :1390-1396
[5]   The exploitation of mutualisms [J].
Bronstein, JL .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2001, 4 (03) :277-287
[6]   DISTINGUISHING MECHANISMS FOR THE EVOLUTION OF COOPERATION [J].
BULL, JJ ;
RICE, WR .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1991, 149 (01) :63-74
[7]   Legume sanctions and the evolution of symbiotic cooperation by rhizobia [J].
Denison, RF .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2000, 156 (06) :567-576
[8]  
DOWLING DN, 1986, ANNU REV MICROBIOL, V40, P131, DOI 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.001023
[9]   Cheating is not always punished:: killer female plants and pollination by deceit in the dwarf palm Chamaerops humilis [J].
Dufay, M ;
Anstett, MC .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2004, 17 (04) :862-868
[10]   Cheating and the evolutionary stability of mutualisms [J].
Ferriere, R ;
Bronstein, JL ;
Rinaldi, S ;
Law, R ;
Gauduchon, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 269 (1493) :773-780