Education Policy as a Practice of Power Theoretical Tools, Ethnographic Methods, Democratic Options

被引:238
作者
Levinson, Bradley A. U. [1 ,2 ]
Sutton, Margaret
Winstead, Teresa [3 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Educ, Dept Educ Leadership & Policy Studies, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Ctr Latin Amer & Caribbean Studies, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Dept Anthropol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
education policy; methodology; critical theory;
D O I
10.1177/0895904808320676
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article outlines some theoretical and methodological parameters of a critical practice approach to policy. The article discusses the origins of this approach, how it can be uniquely adapted to educational analysis, and why it matters-not only for scholarly interpretation but also for the democratization of policy processes as well. Key to the exposition is the concept of appropriation as a form of creative interpretive practice necessarily engaged in by different people involved in the policy process. Another crucial distinction is made between authorized policy and unauthorized or informal policy; it is argued that when nonauthorized policy actors appropriate policy they are in effect often making new policy in situated locales and communities of practice.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 795
页数:29
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Agger B., 2013, CRITICAL SOCIAL THEO, VThird
[2]  
Aguilar Villanueva LF, 1992, HECHURA POLITICAS
[3]  
Andre -Bechely L., 2005, COULD IT BE OTHERWIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, RESILIENCE STATE DEM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Democracy in Dark Times
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Democracy and Difference
[7]  
[Anonymous], J LEGAL PLURALISM
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, J LEGAL PLURALISM
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1997, EVERYDAY WORLD PROBL
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1969, REINVENTING ANTHR