Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language

被引:41
作者
Emmorey, Karen [1 ]
Bosworth, Rain [2 ]
Kraljic, Tanya [3 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Sch Speech Language & Hearing Sci, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
American Sign Language; Self-monitoring; Visual feedback; AUDITORY-FEEDBACK; WORD PRODUCTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; WORKING-MEMORY; NEURAL SYSTEMS; DEAF PEOPLE; PERCEPTION; MOVEMENTS; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.001
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The perceptual loop theory of self-monitoring posits that auditory speech output is parsed by the comprehension system. For sign language, however, visual input from one's own signing is distinct from visual input received from another's signing. Two experiments investigated the role of visual feedback in the production of American Sign Language (ASL). Experiment 1 revealed that signers were poor at recognizing ASL signs when viewed as they would appear during self-produced signing. Experiment 2 showed that the absence or blurring of visual feedback did not affect production performance when deaf signers learned to reproduce signs from Russian Sign Language, and production performance of hearing non-signers was slightly worse with visual feedback. Signers may rely primarily on somatosensory feedback when monitoring language output, and if the perceptual loop theory is to be maintained, the comprehension system must be able to parse a somatosensory signal as well as an external perceptual signal for both sign and speech. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 411
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Language, cognition, and the brain
  • [2] CHART DEMONSTRATING VARIATIONS IN ACUITY WITH RETINAL POSITION
    ANSTIS, SM
    [J]. VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (07) : 589 - 592
  • [3] ARENA V, 2007, CUNY C HUM SENT PROC
  • [4] The perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people: Insights into the nature of subvocal thought and sensory feedback loops
    Atkinson, Joanna R.
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2006, 32 (04) : 701 - 708
  • [5] Atkinson Joanna R, 2007, Cogn Neuropsychiatry, V12, P339, DOI 10.1080/13546800701238229
  • [6] Brentari Diane., 1998, A prosodic model of sign language phonology
  • [7] Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study
    Buccino, G
    Binkofski, F
    Fink, GR
    Fadiga, L
    Fogassi, L
    Gallese, V
    Seitz, RJ
    Zilles, K
    Rizzolatti, G
    Freund, HJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (02) : 400 - 404
  • [8] SUSCEPTIBILITY TO DELAYED AUDITORY FEEDBACK AND DEPENDENCE ON AUDITORY OR ORAL SENSORY FEEDBACK
    BURKE, BD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 1975, 8 (01) : 75 - 96
  • [9] Conlin KE, 2000, LANGUAGE ACQUISITION BY EYE, P51
  • [10] Language lateralization in a bimanual language
    Corina, DP
    Jose-Robertson, LS
    Guillemin, A
    High, J
    Braun, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (05) : 718 - 730