Impact of Repeat Dosing and Mesh Exposure Chronicity on Exosome-Induced Vaginal Tissue Regeneration in a Porcine Mesh Exposure Model

被引:12
|
作者
Kisby, Cassandra K. [1 ]
Shadrin, Ilya Y. [2 ]
Peng, Lillian T. [3 ]
Stalboerger, Paul G. [4 ]
Trabuco, Emanuel C. [1 ]
Behfar, Atta [4 ,5 ]
Occhino, John A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Urogynecol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Alix Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Van Cleve Cardiac Regenerat Med Program, Ctr Regenerat Med, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN USA
来源
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY | 2021年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
exosome; extracellular vesicles; mesh complication; mesh exposure; neovascularization; regenerative medicine; pelvic organ prolapse; porcine; stress urinary incontinence; vaginal mesh; wound healing; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; CELLS; RECURRENCE; ANGIOGENESIS; PARADIGM; MEDICINE; IMPLANTS; EROSION; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1097/SPV.0000000000001017
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to compare vaginal wound healing after exosome injection in a porcine mesh exposure model with (1) single versus multiple dose regimens and (2) acute versus subacute exposure. Methods Six 80-kg Yorkshire-crossed swine each had 2 polypropylene meshes implanted to create the vaginal mesh exposure model. Animals were divided into 3 groups based on number and timing of exosome injection: (1) single purified exosome product (PEP) injection (acute-single), (2) weekly PEP injections (acute-weekly, 4 total injections), and (3) delayed single injection (subacute-single). Acute and subacute injections occurred 1 and 8 weeks after mesh implantation, respectively. EdU, a thymidine analog, was given twice weekly after the first injection to track tissue regeneration. Euthanasia and tissue analysis occurred 4 weeks after the first injection. ImageJ was used to quantify epithelial thickness, cellular proliferation, and capillary density. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test. Results Acute-single PEP injection tissues mirrored pilot study results, validating replication of protocol. Within the acute groups, weekly dosing resulted in 1.5x higher epithelial thickness (nonsignificant), 1.8x higher epithelial proliferation (P < 0.05), and 1.5x higher regenerated capillary density (P < 0.05) compared with single injection. Regarding chronicity of the exposure, the subacute group showed 1.7x higher epithelial proliferation (nonsignificant) and similar capillary density and epithelial thickness as compared with the acute group. Conclusions Exosome redosing resulted in significantly greater epithelial proliferation with significantly higher regenerated capillary density, leading to a trend toward thicker epithelium. Subacute exposure exhibited similar regeneration to acute exposure despite a delayed injection timeline. These results contribute to a growing body of preclinical research demonstrating utility of exosomes in pelvic floor disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 201
页数:7
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Exosome-Induced Vaginal Tissue Regeneration in a Porcine Mesh Exposure Model
    Kisby, Cassandra K.
    Shadrin, Ilya Y.
    Rolland, Tyler J.
    Stalboerger, Paul G.
    Zhou, Boran
    Trabuco, Emanuel C.
    Behfar, Atta
    Occhino, John A.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 27 (10): : 609 - 615
  • [2] Vaginal native tissue repair versus transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse: how utilizing different methods of analysis affects the estimated trade-off between reoperation for mesh exposure/erosion and reoperation for recurrent prolapse
    Dieter, Alexis A.
    Willis-Gray, Marcella G.
    Weidner, Alison C.
    Visco, Anthony G.
    Myers, Evan R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (05) : 721 - 727
  • [3] Vaginal native tissue repair versus transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse: how utilizing different methods of analysis affects the estimated trade-off between reoperation for mesh exposure/erosion and reoperation for recurrent prolapse
    Alexis A. Dieter
    Marcella G. Willis-Gray
    Alison C. Weidner
    Anthony G. Visco
    Evan R. Myers
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 721 - 727