Different approaches to assessment of lymph nodes and surgical margin status in patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy

被引:16
作者
Liszka, Lukasz [1 ]
Pajak, Jacek [1 ]
Zielinska-Pajak, Ewa [1 ]
Golka, Dariusz [3 ]
Mrowiec, Slawomir [2 ]
Lampe, Pawel [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Histopathol, PL-40754 Katowice, Poland
[2] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, PL-40754 Katowice, Poland
[3] Victoria Hosp, Dept Pathol, Blackpool, England
关键词
Pancreatic ductal carcinoma; pancreatectomy; lymph node; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; POTENTIAL QUALITY MEASURE; RESECTION MARGINS; RECTAL-CANCER; R1; RESECTION; PATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; SPECIMEN; RATES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3109/00313020903494060
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aim: To develop a method of gross examination of pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, allowing adequate assessment of the entire pancreatic surface as a surgical margin, which would not affect the lymph node yield. Methods: We retrospectively compared the R1 rates (i.e., proportions of patients with microscopic residual tumour at surgical margins) and lymph node yield in a series of 67 consecutive cases of pT3 ductal adenocarcinomas diagnosed in pancreaticoduodenectomy specimens during three different periods of time and sampled using three different approaches: (1) period 2006-2007, when the pancreatic surface (except for the transection margin and superior mesenteric artery margin) was not examined; (2) period January-September 2008, when the posterior pancreatic surface (posterior circumferential radial margin) was examined using an improved method based on sampling of 2.0-2.5 mm thick consecutive slices perpendicular to the duodenal axis; and (3) period October 2008 - June 2009, when the whole surface of the pancreatic head was sampled using the approach mentioned above. Results: The R1 rates in three consecutive time periods were 23.5%, 40% and 53.8%, respectively. Median numbers of retrieved peripancreatic lymph nodes were 11.0, 12.0 and 14.0, respectively. Conclusions: The newly proposed approach allowed adequate assessment of the entire pancreatic head surface as a surgical margin and reduced the risk of under-detection of R1 status. Moreover, this approach did not affect the number of peripancreatic lymph nodes examined.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 146
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The number of lymph nodes identified in a simple pancreatoduodenectomy specimen: comparison of conventional vs orange-peeling approach in pathologic assessment [J].
Adsay, N. Volkan ;
Basturk, Olca ;
Altinel, Deniz ;
Khanani, Fayyaz ;
Coban, Ipek ;
Weaver, Donald W. ;
Kooby, David A. ;
Sarmiento, Juan M. ;
Staley, Charles .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 (01) :107-112
[2]  
Bilchik A, 2007, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V142, P773
[3]   Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Birbeck, KF ;
Macklin, CP ;
Tiffin, NJ ;
Parsons, W ;
Dixon, MF ;
Mapstone, NP ;
Abbott, CR ;
Scott, N ;
Finan, PJ ;
Johnston, D ;
Quirke, P .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) :449-457
[4]   Crossing the Rubicon: When Pancreatic Resection with Curative Intent Ends in an R2 Status [J].
Bockhorn, Maximilian ;
Cataldegirmen, Guellue ;
Kutup, Asad ;
Marx, Andreas ;
Burdelski, Christoph ;
Vashist, Jogesh K. ;
Mann, Oliver ;
Liebl, Lena ;
Koenig, Alexandra ;
Izbicki, Jakob R. ;
Yekebas, Emre F. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) :1212-1221
[5]   Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer -: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Butturini, Giovanni ;
Stocken, Deborah D. ;
Wente, Moritz N. ;
Jeekel, Hans ;
Klinkenbijl, Johaness H. G. ;
Bakkevold, Kare E. ;
Takada, Tadahiro ;
Amano, Hirano ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Buechler, Markus W. ;
Neoptolemos, John P. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 143 (01) :75-83
[6]   Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections [J].
Esposito, Irene ;
Kleff, Joerg ;
Bergmann, Frank ;
Reiser, Caroline ;
Herpel, Esther ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Schirmacher, Peter ;
Buechler, Markus W. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (06) :1651-1660
[7]  
Evans DB, 2002, ANN SURG, V236, P694, DOI 10.1097/00000658-200211000-00023
[8]   Outcome of R1 resection in patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic cancer [J].
Fusai, G. ;
Warnaar, N. ;
Sabin, C. A. ;
Archibong, S. ;
Davidson, B. R. .
EJSO, 2008, 34 (12) :1309-1315
[9]  
Gill Anthony J, 2009, Pathology, V41, P161
[10]  
GREENE FL, 2006, AM JOINT COMMITTEE C