Interaction between Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Frequently Occurs in a Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network

被引:53
作者
Shimizu, Kana [1 ]
Toh, Hiroyuki [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Computat Biol Res Ctr, Tokyo 1350064, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Med Inst Bioregulat, Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
基金
日本科学技术振兴机构;
关键词
intrinsic disorder; protein-protein interaction; human genome; coupled folding and binding; synergistic folding; NATIVELY UNFOLDED PROTEINS; UNSTRUCTURED PROTEINS; BINDING; DATABASE; RECOGNITION; RESOURCE; ROLES; MAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmb.2009.07.088
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Intrinsic protein disorder is a widespread phenomenon characterised by a lack of stable three-dimensional structures and is considered to play an important role in protein-protein interactions (PPIs). This study examined the genome-wide preference of disorder in PPIs by using exhaustive disorder prediction in human PPIs. We categorised the PPIs. into three types (interaction between disordered proteins, interaction between structured proteins, and interaction between a disordered protein and a structured protein) with regard to the flexibility of molecular recognition and compared these three interaction types in an existing human PPI network with those in a randomised network. Although the structured regions were expected to become the identifiers for binding recognition, this comparative analysis revealed unexpected results. The occurrence of interactions between disordered proteins was significantly frequent, and that between a disordered protein and a structured protein was significantly infrequent. We found that this propensity was much stronger in interactions between nonhub proteins. We also analysed the interaction types from a functional standpoint by using GO, which revealed that the interaction between disordered proteins frequently occurred in cellular processes, regulation, and metabolic processes. The number of interactions, especially in metabolic processes between disordered proteins, was 1.8 times as large as that in the randomised network. Another analysis conducted by using KEGG pathways provided results where several signaling pathways and disease-related pathways included many interactions between disordered proteins. All of these analyses suggest that human PPIs preferably occur between disordered proteins and that the flexibility of the interacting protein pairs may play an important role in human PPI networks. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1265
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J].
Albert, R ;
Jeong, H ;
Barabási, AL .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6794) :378-382
[2]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[3]   Structural definition of the F-actin-binding THATCH domain from HIP1R [J].
Brett, TJ ;
Legendre-Guillemin, V ;
McPherson, PS ;
Fremont, DH .
NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) :121-130
[4]   SSMap: A new UniProt-PDB mapping resource for the curation of structural-related information in the UniProt/Swiss-Prot Knowledgebase [J].
David, Fabrice P. A. ;
Yip, Yum L. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 9 (1)
[5]   Mutual synergistic folding in recruitment of CBP/p300 by p160 nuclear receptor coactivators [J].
Demarest, SJ ;
Martinez-Yamout, M ;
Chung, J ;
Chen, HW ;
Xu, W ;
Dyson, HJ ;
Evans, RM ;
Wright, PE .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6871) :549-553
[6]  
Demchenko AP, 2001, J MOL RECOGNIT, V14, P42, DOI 10.1002/1099-1352(200101/02)14:1<42::AID-JMR518>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-8
[8]   Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution [J].
Dosztanyi, Zsuzsanna ;
Chen, Jake ;
Dunker, A. Keith ;
Simon, Istvan ;
Tompa, Peter .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2006, 5 (11) :2985-2995
[9]  
Dunker A K, 2000, Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform, V11, P161
[10]   Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins [J].
Dunker, A. Keith ;
Silman, Israel ;
Uversky, Vladimir N. ;
Sussman, Joel L. .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (06) :756-764