Validity of Medical Insurance Guidelines for Orthognathic Surgery

被引:4
作者
Schneider, Sydney A. [1 ]
Gateno, Jaime [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Coppelson, Kevin B. [5 ]
English, Jeryl D. [1 ]
Xia, James J. [3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Houston Methodist Hosp, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Acad Inst, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Houston, TX USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Clin Surg Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Houston Methodist Hosp, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, Surg Planning Lab, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Dept, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT SYMPTOMS; MORPHOLOGIC ALTERATIONS; SPEECH; OSTEOTOMIES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the medical insurance guidelines for orthognathic surgery used by the major American medical insurance companies. Materials and Methods: This study assessed the validity of the medical insurance guidelines for orthognathic surgery used by Aetna, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), Cigna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare (UHC). To evaluate the validity, we calculated the approval and denial rates of the 5 guidelines when we used them to assess the medical necessity for a control group of carefully selected patients. Patients were included in the control group if they met the criteria of a "prudent provider," crafted for this study. All rejected cases were analyzed to determine the root cause of the denials. The validity of the guidelines was also ascertained by determining their completeness and correctness. Results: The current study proves that no insurance guideline is in agreement with the criteria of a "pru-dent provide," When applied to carefully chosen patients, the requirements of BCBS, Aetna, Humana, and Cigna produce modest rejection rates of 6 to 12%. UHC is an outlier. Its guideline rejects 86% of patients, a rate about 7 times higher than its peers. Insurance guidelines disqualified patients for 3 different reasons: 1) no significant jaw deformity, 2) no demonstrable health impairment, and 3) the etiology of the condition is not a covered benefit. Additional evaluations demonstrate that the private insurance guidelines are incomplete, and at times, incorrect. Conclusions: This study shows that the medical insurance guidelines for orthognathic surgery used by the major American medical insurance plans need revision. The most consequential flaw was considering etiology in judging medical necessity. Fortunately, only one company adopted this policy. Moreover, all guidelines have omissions and errors in the way jaw deformity is determined and how health impairment is determined. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 684
页数:13
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   Alterations of temporomandibular disorders before and after orthognathic surgery - A systematic review [J].
Abrahamsson, Cecilia ;
Ekberg, EwaCarin ;
Henrikson, Thor ;
Bondemark, Lars .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2007, 77 (04) :729-734
[2]  
Aetna, 2018, TEMPOROMANDIBULAR DI
[3]  
Aetna, 2018, ORTHOGNATHIC SURG ME
[4]  
Aetna, 2018, OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP AP
[5]  
Ahmed Maheen, 2018, Dental Press J. Orthod., V23, P75, DOI 10.1590/2177-6709.23.5.075-081.oar
[6]   Orthognathic Surgeries in Patients With Congenital Craniofacial Anomalies: Profile and Hospitalization Outcomes [J].
Allareddy, Veerasathpurush .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2015, 52 (06) :698-705
[7]   DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-2 - PREDICTIVE VALUES .4. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) :102-102
[8]  
AMA, 2016, DEFINITIONS SCREENIN
[9]  
AMARATUNGA NAD, 1989, BRIT J ORAL MAX SURG, V27, P451
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, CLIN GUIDE PEDIATRIC