TRUS-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy with template for the diagnosis of prostate cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Guo, Gang [1 ]
Xu, Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Xu [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Peoples Liberat Army, Dept Urol, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate needle biopsy; 12+X cores; prostate-specific antigen; transperineal; MRI; HISTOSCANNING(TM); 10-CORE; FUSION; VOLUME;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2017.6051
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The objective of the present study was to explore the clinical value and safety of trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided transperineal prostate 12+X core biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Patients who received a TRUS-guided transperineal prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer at the General Hospital of The People's Liberation Army between September 2009 and May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed, this consisted of 1,300 patients. These patients were randomly divided into the 12+X core group or the standard 12-core group. The mean age of all the patients was 70.5 years old. Levels of prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were checked and used as reference prior and subsequent to the biopsy procedure. The 12+X core group consisted of 937 patients and the 12-core group consisted of 363 patients. The mean number of core samples taken from both groups was 14.5 (ranging from 12 to 24) and the mean operative time of the whole group was 20.4 min (ranging from 15 to 40 min). The puncture positive detection rate of abnormal rectal examination, trans-rectal ultrasound, and MRI was 24.0, 30.1, and 59.2%, respectively, whereas the puncture positive rate was 47.2% in 12+X core group and 34.5% in 12-core group. Improved prostate needle biopsy with 12+X cores was found to have significantly higher detection rate than that with 12 cores as well as fewer post-operative complications, therefore making the method ideal for diagnosing prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:4863 / 4867
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multiparametric MRI and MRI/TRUS Fusion Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Kesch, Claudia
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 87 - 98
  • [32] Transperineal template-guided biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with at least two prior negative biopsies
    Klatte, Tobias
    Swietek, Natalia
    Schatzl, Georg
    Waldert, Matthias
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2013, 125 (21-22) : 669 - 673
  • [33] Utility of early transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy for risk stratification in men undergoing active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Voss, James
    Pal, Raj
    Ahmed, Shaista
    Hannah, Magnus
    Jaulim, Adil
    Walton, Thomas
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (06) : 863 - 870
  • [34] Transperineal template saturation and conventional biopsy for stage prediction in prostate cancer
    Lehner, Fabienne
    Crippa, Alessio
    Sigg, Silvan
    Eberli, Daniel
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (06) : 696 - 704
  • [35] The role of transperineal template biopsies of the prostate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a review
    Abdulmajed, Mohamed Ismat
    Hughes, Daniel
    Shergill, Iqbal Singh
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2015, 12 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [36] Clinical study on mpMRI/TRUS software fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Ying, Chen
    Wang, Yongbo
    Wang, Jianping
    Rao, Minghuang
    Li, Chao
    Wang, Yongchao
    Huang, Yujian
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2025, 21 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [37] Diagnostic value of ten systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsies
    Ravery, V
    Billebaud, T
    Toublanc, M
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Hermieu, JF
    Moulinier, F
    Blanc, E
    Delmas, V
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1999, 35 (04) : 298 - 303
  • [38] Difference of cancer core distribution between first and repeat biopsy: In patients diagnosed by extensive transperineal ultrasound guided template prostate biopsy
    Furuno, T
    Demura, T
    Kaneta, T
    Gotoda, H
    Muraoka, S
    Sato, T
    Nagamori, S
    Shinohara, N
    Koyanagi, T
    PROSTATE, 2004, 58 (01) : 76 - 81
  • [39] The Efficacy of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Biopsy of the Prostate in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
    Nafie, Shady
    Wanis, Michael
    Khan, Masood
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (02) : 3008 - 3012
  • [40] Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach
    Pepe, Pietro
    Garufi, Antonio
    Priolo, Gian Domenico
    Pennisi, Michele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (06) : 3291 - 3294