Prediction of Oral Pharmacokinetics Using a Combination of In Silico Descriptors and In Vitro ADME Properties

被引:44
作者
Kosugi, Yohei [1 ]
Hosea, Natalie [1 ]
机构
[1] Takeda Calif Inc, Global DMPK, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
关键词
machine learning; quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR); oral clearance prediction; in silico; plasma protein binding; in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE); bottom-up approach; well-stirred model; DRUG DISCOVERY; INTRINSIC CLEARANCE; HEPATIC-CLEARANCE; PARAMETERS; ANIMALS; BINDING; MODELS;
D O I
10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c01009
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of oral pharmacokinetics remains challenging. This study investigated quantitative approaches for the prediction of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve after oral administration (AUC(p,oral)) to rats using the in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), in silico model using machine learning approaches and the combination of the in silico model and in vitro data. A set of 595 structurally diverse compounds with determined AUC(p,oral) at 1 mg/kg, in vitro intrinsic clearance (CLint), an unbound fraction in plasma (f(u,p)) in rats, and kinetic solubility at pH 6.8 was used for this assessment. Prediction models developed by two different types of machine learning techniques (i.e., random forest regression and Gaussian processes) were evaluated using three validation methods implementing the time and cluster-split training and test set and fivefold cross-validation. The developed machine learning models have a square of correlation coefficient (R-2) in the range of 0.381-0.685 with 33-45% of the compounds being predicted within 2-fold of the observed AUC(p,oral) value. The predictivity was improved by incorporating CLint, f(u,p), and solubility as explanatory variables with R-2 = 0.554-0.743. In cases where extraction by the liver is the main elimination pathway and intestinal extraction is negligible, AUC(p,oral) can be expressed by dose, CLint, and f(u,p) based on a well-stirred model. By using this conventional IVIVE approach, only 1.7-5.0% of compounds were predicted within the 2-fold error with R-2 = 0.354-0.487. Two empirical scaling factors (ESFs) determined by linear regression analysis and machine learning approaches improved the predictivity of AUC(p,oral) with 33-44% predicted within twofold variability. The IVIVE using ESF predicted by random forest regression showed better predictivity of AUC(p,oral) with R-2 = 0.471-0.618, while it still showed lower predictivity than machine learning approaches applied directly to AUC(p,oral) prediction. This study demonstrated that the combination of in silico and in vitro parameters is useful to improve the predictivity of the machine learning model for rat AUC(p,oral) and supports consideration for predicting AUC(p,oral) for human and other non-clinical species in a similar manner.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1079
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] In silico prediction of ADME properties:: Are we making progress?
    Beresford, AP
    Segall, M
    Tarbit, MH
    CURRENT OPINION IN DRUG DISCOVERY & DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 7 (01) : 36 - 42
  • [2] Application of In Silico, In Vitro and Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Data for the Effective and Efficient Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetics
    Grime, Kenneth H.
    Barton, Patrick
    McGinnity, Dermot F.
    MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS, 2013, 10 (04) : 1191 - 1206
  • [3] In silico prediction of ADME and pharmacokinetics - Report of an expert meeting organised by COST B15
    Boobis, A
    Gundert-Remy, U
    Kremers, P
    Macheras, P
    Pelkonen, O
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 17 (4-5) : 183 - 193
  • [4] Prediction of In-silico ADME Properties of 1,2-O-Isopropylidene Aldohexose Derivatives
    Kovacevic, Strahinja Z.
    Jevric, Lidija R.
    Kuzmanovic, Sanja O. Podunavac
    Loncar, Eva S.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 13 (03): : 899 - 907
  • [5] Characterisation of intravenous pharmacokinetics in Gottingen minipig and clearance prediction using established in vitro to in vivo extrapolation methodologies
    Langthaler, Kristine
    Jones, Christopher R.
    Christensen, Rasmus B.
    Eneberg, Elin
    Brodin, Birger
    Bundgaard, Christoffer
    XENOBIOTICA, 2022, 52 (06) : 591 - 607
  • [6] Prediction of the human oral bioavailability by using in vitro and in silico drug related parameters in a physiologically based absorption model
    Paixao, Paulo
    Gouveia, Luis F.
    Morais, Jose A. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2012, 429 (1-2) : 84 - 98
  • [7] Drug Design Tools - In Silico, In Vitro and In Vivo ADME/PK Prediction and Interpretation: Is PK in Monkey An Essential Part of a Good Human PK Prediction?
    Hosea, Natilie A.
    CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 11 (04) : 351 - 357
  • [8] Prediction of bioactive compounds hepatotoxicity using in silico and in vitro analysis
    Choi, Kwanyong
    Lee, Soyeon
    Yoo, Sunyong
    Han, Hyoung-Yun
    Park, Soo-yeon
    Kim, Ji Yeon
    APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 67 (01)
  • [9] In silico predictions of the human pharmacokinetics/toxicokinetics of 65 chemicals from various classes using conformal prediction methodology
    Fagerholm, Urban
    Hellberg, Sven
    Alvarsson, Jonathan
    Spjuth, Ola
    XENOBIOTICA, 2022, 52 (02) : 113 - 118
  • [10] Antileishmanial evaluation of clubbed bis(indolyl)-pyridine derivatives: One-pot synthesis, in vitro biological evaluations and in silico ADME prediction
    Khan, Firoz A. Kalam
    Zaheer, Zahid
    Sangshetti, Jaiprakash N.
    Patil, Rajendra H.
    Farooqui, Mazahar
    BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2017, 27 (03) : 567 - 573