Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Xie, Peiwei [1 ]
Yan, Jing [1 ]
Ye, Ling [1 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
Li, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Chen, Youxiang [1 ]
Li, Guohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, 17 Yongwai St, Nanchang 30006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
GERD; Transoral incisionless fundoplication; Radiofrequency ablation; Network meta-analysis; TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY DELIVERY; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; TIF; 2.0; STRETTA PROCEDURE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; GERD SYMPTOMS; ACID EXPOSURE; SHAM;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08386-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Both transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and radiofrequency ablation (Stretta) are representative endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but they have not been directly compared. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effects of Stretta, TIF, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Methods PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of either the Stretta, TIF, or PPIs/sham procedure for GERD treatment. The NMA was conducted using frequentist methods. Results A total of 516 participants from 10 RCTs were included in this NMA. Both Stretta (mean difference, MD - 9.77, 95% confidence interval, CI - 12.85 to - 6.70) and TIF (MD - 12.22, 95% CI - 15.93 to - 8.52) were significantly superior to PPIs at improving health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores and heartburn scores (Stretta: MD - 1.53, 95% CI - 2.98 to - 0.08; TIF: MD - 9.60, 95% CI - 17.79 to - 1.41). Stretta (MD - 3.77, 95% CI - 6.88 to - 0.65) was less effective at increasing lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than TIF. Stretta was significantly superior to TIF (MD - 3.25, 95% CI - 5.95 to - 0.56) at improving esophageal acid exposure. Regarding the decrease in PPIs utility and esophagitis incidence, no significant differences were found between TIF and Stretta. Conclusion In terms of short-term reduction of the HRQL score and heartburn score in patients with GERD, TIF and Stretta may be comparable to each other, and both may be more effective than PPIs. TIF may increase the LES pressure in comparison with Stretta and PPIs. PPIs may reduce the percentage of time pH < 4.0 when compared with TIF. This evidence should be interpreted with caution given the small number of included studies and inherent heterogeneity. Registration No. CRD42020188345.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1510
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic review with network meta-analysis: indirect comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan and proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Hiroto Miwa
    Ataru Igarashi
    Lida Teng
    Akihito Uda
    Hisato Deguchi
    Toshiro Tango
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2019, 54 : 718 - 729
  • [42] A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Twice Daily PPIs versus Once Daily for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Zhang, Hongying
    Yang, Zhiping
    Ni, Zhen
    Shi, Yongquan
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2017, 2017
  • [43] 7RECENT Advances in Endoscopic Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Farhan Quader
    C. Prakash Gyawali
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2020, 18 (3) : 504 - 517
  • [44] Alginate therapy is effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leiman, D. A.
    Riff, B. P.
    Morgan, S.
    Metz, D. C.
    Falk, G. W.
    French, B.
    Umscheid, C. A.
    Lewis, D.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2017, 30 (02)
  • [45] Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhuang, Qian Jun
    Tan, Nian Di
    Chen, Song Feng
    Zhang, Meng Yu
    Xiao, Ying Lian
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2021, 22 (12) : 695 - 705
  • [46] Bidirectional correlation between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sleep problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Xiaolong
    Wang, Shasha
    Wu, Fengjie
    Zhu, Jun
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [47] Association between obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chehade, Nabil El Hage
    Fu, Yuhan
    Ghoneim, Sara
    Shah, Sagar
    Song, Gengqing
    Fass, Ronnie
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (08) : 1244 - 1251
  • [48] Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of esomeprazole and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi, Qian
    Wang, Rugang
    Liu, Lin
    Zhao, Feng
    Wang, Sheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 53 (10) : 803 - 810
  • [49] Statins and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A meta-analysis
    Wijarnpreecha, K.
    Panjawatanan, P.
    Leelasinjaroen, L.
    Ungprasert, P.
    JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2019, 65 (04) : 207 - +
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Patients With Portal Hypertension and Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
    Yao, Qigu
    Chen, Wenyi
    Yan, Cuilin
    Yu, Jiong
    Jiang, Tian'an
    Cao, Hongcui
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8