Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Xie, Peiwei [1 ]
Yan, Jing [1 ]
Ye, Ling [1 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
Li, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Chen, Youxiang [1 ]
Li, Guohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, 17 Yongwai St, Nanchang 30006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
GERD; Transoral incisionless fundoplication; Radiofrequency ablation; Network meta-analysis; TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY DELIVERY; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; TIF; 2.0; STRETTA PROCEDURE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; GERD SYMPTOMS; ACID EXPOSURE; SHAM;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08386-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Both transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and radiofrequency ablation (Stretta) are representative endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but they have not been directly compared. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effects of Stretta, TIF, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Methods PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of either the Stretta, TIF, or PPIs/sham procedure for GERD treatment. The NMA was conducted using frequentist methods. Results A total of 516 participants from 10 RCTs were included in this NMA. Both Stretta (mean difference, MD - 9.77, 95% confidence interval, CI - 12.85 to - 6.70) and TIF (MD - 12.22, 95% CI - 15.93 to - 8.52) were significantly superior to PPIs at improving health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores and heartburn scores (Stretta: MD - 1.53, 95% CI - 2.98 to - 0.08; TIF: MD - 9.60, 95% CI - 17.79 to - 1.41). Stretta (MD - 3.77, 95% CI - 6.88 to - 0.65) was less effective at increasing lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than TIF. Stretta was significantly superior to TIF (MD - 3.25, 95% CI - 5.95 to - 0.56) at improving esophageal acid exposure. Regarding the decrease in PPIs utility and esophagitis incidence, no significant differences were found between TIF and Stretta. Conclusion In terms of short-term reduction of the HRQL score and heartburn score in patients with GERD, TIF and Stretta may be comparable to each other, and both may be more effective than PPIs. TIF may increase the LES pressure in comparison with Stretta and PPIs. PPIs may reduce the percentage of time pH < 4.0 when compared with TIF. This evidence should be interpreted with caution given the small number of included studies and inherent heterogeneity. Registration No. CRD42020188345.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1510
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Response to "No Evidence for Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis"
    Richardson, William S.
    Stefanidis, Dimitrios
    Fanelli, Robert D.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 13 (09) : 1700 - 1701
  • [32] Increased Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Among Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Thongpiya, Jerapas
    Charoenngam, Nipith
    Ponvilawan, Ben
    Yingchoncharoen, Pitchaporn
    Jaroenlapnopparat, Aunchalee
    Ungprasert, Patompong
    CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (04) : 496 - 503
  • [33] Systematic review of endoscopic treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
    Chen, D.
    Barber, C.
    McLoughlin, P.
    Thavaneswaran, P.
    Jamieson, G. G.
    Maddern, G. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (02) : 128 - 136
  • [34] Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy of existing treatments for patients with recurrent glioblastoma
    Schritz, Anna
    Aouali, Nassera
    Fischer, Aurelie
    Dessenne, Coralie
    Adams, Roisin
    Berchem, Guy
    Huiart, Laetitia
    Schmitz, Susanne
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY ADVANCES, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [35] Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rickenbacher, Nadja
    Koetter, Thomas
    Kochen, Michael M.
    Scherer, Martin
    Blozik, Eva
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (01): : 143 - 155
  • [36] Fundoplication versus medical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nadja Rickenbacher
    Thomas Kötter
    Michael M. Kochen
    Martin Scherer
    Eva Blozik
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 143 - 155
  • [37] Antireflux mucosal intervention (ARMI) procedures for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeh, Jen-Hao
    Lee, Ching-Tai
    Hsu, Min-Hung
    Lin, Chi-Wen
    Hsiao, Po-Jen
    Chen, Chien-Lin
    Wang, Wen-Lun
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 15
  • [38] Endoscopic treatments for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Chen, Jie
    Ye, Jianfang
    Zheng, Xiong
    Chen, Jianyong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (03) : 301 - 308
  • [39] Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fidler, Lee
    Sitzer, Nicole
    Shapera, Shane
    Shah, Prakesh S.
    CHEST, 2018, 153 (06) : 1405 - 1415
  • [40] Systematic review with network meta-analysis: indirect comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan and proton-pump inhibitors for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Miwa, Hiroto
    Igarashi, Ataru
    Teng, Lida
    Uda, Akihito
    Deguchi, Hisato
    Tango, Toshiro
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 54 (08) : 718 - 729