Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Xie, Peiwei [1 ]
Yan, Jing [1 ]
Ye, Ling [1 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
Li, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Chen, Youxiang [1 ]
Li, Guohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, 17 Yongwai St, Nanchang 30006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
GERD; Transoral incisionless fundoplication; Radiofrequency ablation; Network meta-analysis; TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY DELIVERY; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; TIF; 2.0; STRETTA PROCEDURE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; GERD SYMPTOMS; ACID EXPOSURE; SHAM;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08386-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Both transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and radiofrequency ablation (Stretta) are representative endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but they have not been directly compared. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effects of Stretta, TIF, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Methods PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of either the Stretta, TIF, or PPIs/sham procedure for GERD treatment. The NMA was conducted using frequentist methods. Results A total of 516 participants from 10 RCTs were included in this NMA. Both Stretta (mean difference, MD - 9.77, 95% confidence interval, CI - 12.85 to - 6.70) and TIF (MD - 12.22, 95% CI - 15.93 to - 8.52) were significantly superior to PPIs at improving health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores and heartburn scores (Stretta: MD - 1.53, 95% CI - 2.98 to - 0.08; TIF: MD - 9.60, 95% CI - 17.79 to - 1.41). Stretta (MD - 3.77, 95% CI - 6.88 to - 0.65) was less effective at increasing lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than TIF. Stretta was significantly superior to TIF (MD - 3.25, 95% CI - 5.95 to - 0.56) at improving esophageal acid exposure. Regarding the decrease in PPIs utility and esophagitis incidence, no significant differences were found between TIF and Stretta. Conclusion In terms of short-term reduction of the HRQL score and heartburn score in patients with GERD, TIF and Stretta may be comparable to each other, and both may be more effective than PPIs. TIF may increase the LES pressure in comparison with Stretta and PPIs. PPIs may reduce the percentage of time pH < 4.0 when compared with TIF. This evidence should be interpreted with caution given the small number of included studies and inherent heterogeneity. Registration No. CRD42020188345.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1510
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endoscopic plication compared to laparoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alexander Hajjar
    Kevin Verhoeff
    Uzair Jogiat
    Valentin Mocanu
    Daniel W. Birch
    Noah J. Switzer
    Clarence Wong
    Shahzeer Karmali
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 5791 - 5806
  • [22] Efficacy of Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication vs Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication or Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Richter, Joel E.
    Kumar, Ambuj
    Lipka, Seth
    Miladinovic, Branko
    Velanovich, Vic
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (05) : 1298 - +
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of alginate formulations in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhao, C-X
    Wang, J-W
    Gong, M.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 24 (22) : 11845 - 11857
  • [24] Comparing the efficacy of different proton pump inhibitor dosing regimens for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nguyen, Tyra
    Barnhill, Katherine
    Zhornitskiy, Alex
    Yu, Kyung Sang
    Fuller, Garth
    Makaroff, Katherine
    Spiegel, Brennan M. R.
    Gresham, Gillian
    Almario, Christopher, V
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 38 (01)
  • [25] Comparative efficacy of different treatments for menstrual migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Han Zhang
    Jian-Zhi Qi
    Zhi-Hua Zhang
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 24
  • [26] Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Oor, Jelmer E.
    Roks, David J.
    Unlu, Cagdas
    Hazebroek, Eric J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 211 (01) : 250 - 267
  • [27] Melatonin for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease; protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bang, Chang Seok
    Yang, Young Joo
    Baik, Gwang Ho
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (04)
  • [28] Gastroesophageal reflux disease and head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eells, Annica C.
    Mackintosh, Christopher
    Marks, Lisa
    Marino, Michael J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06)
  • [29] Efficacy and Risks of Different Treatments for Oral Hyperpigmentation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Jazzar, Ahoud
    Aldehlawi, Hebah
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (20)
  • [30] Comparative efficacy of different treatments for menstrual migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Han
    Qi, Jian-Zhi
    Zhang, Zhi-Hua
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2023, 24 (01)