Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Xie, Peiwei [1 ]
Yan, Jing [1 ]
Ye, Ling [1 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
Li, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Chen, Youxiang [1 ]
Li, Guohua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gastroenterol, 17 Yongwai St, Nanchang 30006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2021年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
GERD; Transoral incisionless fundoplication; Radiofrequency ablation; Network meta-analysis; TRANSORAL INCISIONLESS FUNDOPLICATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ENERGY DELIVERY; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; TIF; 2.0; STRETTA PROCEDURE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; GERD SYMPTOMS; ACID EXPOSURE; SHAM;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-021-08386-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Both transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and radiofrequency ablation (Stretta) are representative endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but they have not been directly compared. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluated the comparative effects of Stretta, TIF, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Methods PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of either the Stretta, TIF, or PPIs/sham procedure for GERD treatment. The NMA was conducted using frequentist methods. Results A total of 516 participants from 10 RCTs were included in this NMA. Both Stretta (mean difference, MD - 9.77, 95% confidence interval, CI - 12.85 to - 6.70) and TIF (MD - 12.22, 95% CI - 15.93 to - 8.52) were significantly superior to PPIs at improving health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores and heartburn scores (Stretta: MD - 1.53, 95% CI - 2.98 to - 0.08; TIF: MD - 9.60, 95% CI - 17.79 to - 1.41). Stretta (MD - 3.77, 95% CI - 6.88 to - 0.65) was less effective at increasing lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure than TIF. Stretta was significantly superior to TIF (MD - 3.25, 95% CI - 5.95 to - 0.56) at improving esophageal acid exposure. Regarding the decrease in PPIs utility and esophagitis incidence, no significant differences were found between TIF and Stretta. Conclusion In terms of short-term reduction of the HRQL score and heartburn score in patients with GERD, TIF and Stretta may be comparable to each other, and both may be more effective than PPIs. TIF may increase the LES pressure in comparison with Stretta and PPIs. PPIs may reduce the percentage of time pH < 4.0 when compared with TIF. This evidence should be interpreted with caution given the small number of included studies and inherent heterogeneity. Registration No. CRD42020188345.
引用
收藏
页码:1500 / 1510
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yao, Lijia
    Lin, Yanfang
    He, Xiaojian
    Liu, Gang
    Wang, Baoshan
    Wang, Wen
    Li, Dongliang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 28 (07) : 1051 - 1061
  • [2] Efficacy of different endoscopic treatments in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Peiwei Xie
    Jing Yan
    Ling Ye
    Chong Wang
    Yuanyuan Li
    Youxiang Chen
    Guohua Li
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 1500 - 1510
  • [3] Efficacy of Endoscopic and Surgical Treatments for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Gong, Eun Jeong
    Park, Chan Hyuk
    Jung, Da Hyun
    Kang, Sun Hyung
    Lee, Ju Yup
    Lim, Hyun
    Kim, Do Hoon
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [4] Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and prospective cohort efficacy studies of endoscopic radiofrequency for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Fass, Ronnie
    Cahn, Frederick
    Scotti, Dennis J.
    Gregory, David A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (12): : 4865 - 4882
  • [5] Assessing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic antireflux procedures for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review with network meta-analysis
    Andreou, Alexandros
    Watson, David, I
    Mavridis, Dimitrios
    Franciss, Nader K.
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 510 - 520
  • [6] Endoscopic plication compared to laparoscopic fundoplication in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajjar, Alexander
    Verhoeff, Kevin
    Jogiat, Uzair
    Mocanu, Valentin
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Switzer, Noah J.
    Wong, Clarence
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (08): : 5791 - 5806
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic cardia peripheral tissue scar formation (ECSF) for the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Shi, Chaoyi
    Zhuoma, Gesang
    Ying, Lina
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    Cui, Liyang
    Li, Ruifang
    Zhang, Jun
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (10) : E37062
  • [8] Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Niu, Chengu
    Zhang, Jing
    Iyer, Charoo
    Saeed, Hasaan
    Zhu, Kaiwen
    Elkhapery, Ahmed
    Okolo, Patrick, I
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (02) : E199 - E210
  • [9] The Efficacy of Dietary Interventions in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies
    Lakananurak, Narisorn
    Pitisuttithum, Panyavee
    Susantitaphong, Paweena
    Patcharatrakul, Tanisa
    Gonlachanvit, Sutep
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [10] Assessing different diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Mengyu
    Pandolfino, John E.
    Zhou, Xuyu
    Tan, Niandi
    Li, Yuwen
    Chen, Minhu
    Xiao, Yinglian
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 12