Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

被引:74
作者
Gysels, Marjolein
Higginson, Irene J.
机构
[1] Weston Educ Ctr, London SE5 9RJ, England
[2] Guys Kings Coll & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Palliat Care Policy & Rehabil, Kings Coll London Sch Med, London, England
关键词
videotapes; interactive technologies; patient education; decision making; cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-006-0112-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Goals of work: Patients diagnosed with cancer need education as they face complex decisions. There is limited evidence about the impact of new educational technologies for cancer patients. This paper investigates whether interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care improve knowledge, satisfaction or other outcomes. Methods: Literature search of five computerised databases (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System, Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and bibliography searches identified relevant randomized controlled trials. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. Summary effects for knowledge and satisfaction were calculated using random-effects models (RevMan 4.2 software). Continuous data were summarised as weighted mean differences and dichotomous data as odds ratios, each with their respective 95% confidence interval. Standardised effect sizes for these outcomes were calculated and contrasted. Results: Nine randomised control trials with 1,678 patients were identified. Three evaluated the use of videotapes, and six evaluated computer technologies. Studies were of good-quality design but were variable in instruments, content, populations, outcomes and results. Educational technologies showed improved patient knowledge (effect sizes ranging from 0.12 to 1.03). Satisfaction was improved in some studies, but the overall effect was more equivocal-effect sizes ranged (0.05 to 0.40) of benefit for knowledge and from 0 to 0.40 for satisfaction. Conclusions: The trials present preliminary evaluations of the technology in North America, the UK and Australia. There is a trend to improved knowledge and satisfaction. The ways in which the interventions are delivered and the extent of communication with a health professional affect patient responses.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 20
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Endometriosis and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Mahamat-Saleh, Yahya
    Farland, Leslie, V
    Shigesi, Nina
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Harris, Holly R.
    Roman, Horace
    Becker, Christian M.
    As-Sanie, Sawsan
    Zondervan, Krina T.
    Horne, Andrew W.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2021, 27 (02) : 393 - 420
  • [42] Statins and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kuoppala, Jaana
    Lamminpaa, Anne
    Pukkala, Eero
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (15) : 2122 - 2132
  • [43] Systematic review and meta-analysis of collaborative care interventions for depression in patients with cancer
    Li, Madeline
    Kennedy, Erin B.
    Byrne, Nelson
    Gerin-Lajoie, Caroline
    Katz, Mark R.
    Keshavarz, Homa
    Sellick, Scott
    Green, Esther
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 (05) : 573 - 587
  • [44] Ambulatory palliative care and cancer symptom control: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shah, Rajvi
    Everitt, Rachel
    Hince, Dana
    Kissane, David
    Michael, Natasha
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2025,
  • [45] Weight loss as a predictor of cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicholson, Brian D.
    Hamilton, William
    O'Sullivan, Jack
    Aveyard, Paul
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (670) : E311 - E322
  • [46] Palliative care utilisation globally by cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Getie, Addisu
    Yilak, Gizachew
    Ayenew, Temesgen
    Amlak, Baye Tsegaye
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2025,
  • [47] Association of Data Integration Technologies With Intensive Care Clinician Performance A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lin, Ying Ling
    Trbovich, Patricia
    Kolodzey, Lauren
    Nickel, Cheri
    Guerguerian, Anne-Marie
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (05)
  • [48] Calcium supplements and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Bristow, Sarah M.
    Bolland, Mark J.
    MacLennan, Graeme S.
    Avenell, Alison
    Grey, Andrew
    Gamble, Greg D.
    Reid, Ian R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2013, 110 (08) : 1384 - 1393
  • [49] Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on fatigue and psychological wellbeing in women with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials
    McCloy, Kairen
    Hughes, Ciara
    Dunwoody, Lynn
    Marley, Joanne
    Gracey, Jackie
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 31 (11) : 1821 - 1834
  • [50] The effect of decision support systems on pain in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sezgin, Merve Gozde
    Bektas, Hicran
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2022, 54 (05) : 578 - 588