Cryopreservation of Dog Semen in a Tris Extender with 1% or 2% Soya Bean Lecithin as a Replacement of Egg Yolk

被引:18
作者
Axner, E. [1 ]
Lagerson, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Fac Vet Med & Anim Hlth, Dept Clin Sci, Div Reprod, POB 7054, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
EQUEX STM PASTE; SOYBEAN LECITHIN; CANINE SEMEN; IN-VITRO; SPERM; FROZEN; SPERMATOZOA; INSEMINATION; MORPHOLOGY; VIABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/rda.12675
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Contents Egg yolk is usually included in extenders used for preservation of dog semen. Lecithin is an interesting animal-protein free alternative to egg yolk for semen preservation. The aim of our study was to evaluate soya bean lecithin for cryopreservation of dog semen. Five ejaculate replicates were divided in three equal parts, centrifuged and each pellet diluted with one of the three Tris-based extenders containing 20% egg yolk, 1% soya bean lecithin or 2% soya bean lecithin. Extended semen was loaded in 0.5-ml straws, cooled and diluted a second time and frozen in liquid nitrogen vapours. Sperm motility parameters (CASA), acrosome integrity (FITC-PNA/PI) and sperm membrane integrity (C-FDA) were evaluated 5min post-thaw and after 2 and 4h of incubation. Total motility was significantly better in the egg yolk extender than in any of the lecithin-based extender and was better in the 1% lecithin extender than in the 2% lecithin extender. Sperm membrane integrity was significantly better in the egg yolk extender than in any of the lecithin-based extenders but did not differ significantly between the 1% and 2% lecithin extenders. Acrosome integrity was significantly better in the egg yolk extender than in the 2% lecithin extender but did not differ between the egg yolk extender and the 1% lecithin extender or between the two lecithin extenders. In conclusion, egg yolk was superior to lecithin in our study. The extender with 1% lecithin preserved sperm motility better than the extender with 2% lecithin.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 268
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): Capabilities and potential developments [J].
Amann, Rupert P. ;
Waberski, Dagmar .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2014, 81 (01) :5-17
[2]  
ANDERSEN K, 1975, Zuchthygiene (Berlin), V10, P1
[3]   The effect of Equex STM paste and sperm morphology on post-thaw survival of cat epididymal spermatozoa [J].
Axnér, E ;
Hermansson, U ;
Linde-Forsberg, C .
ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2004, 84 (1-2) :179-191
[4]   Freezing of canine semen in an animal-free protein extender [J].
Beccaglia, M. ;
Anastasi, P. ;
Luvoni, G. C. .
VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 33 :S77-S80
[5]   Tris-Lecithin Extender Supplemented With Antioxidant Catalase for Chilling of Canine Semen [J].
Beccaglia, M. ;
Anastasi, P. ;
Chigioni, S. ;
Luvoni, G. C. .
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2009, 44 :345-349
[6]   Canine-chilled Sperm: Study of a Semen Extender Made with Low-density Lipoproteins from Hen Egg Yolk Supplemented with Glutamine [J].
Bencharif, D. ;
Amirat-Briand, L. ;
Le Guillou, J. ;
Garand, A. ;
Anton, M. ;
Schmitt, E. ;
Desherces, S. ;
Delhomme, G. ;
Langlois, M-L ;
Destrumelle, S. ;
Vera-Munoz, O. ;
Barriere, P. ;
Tainturier, D. .
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2013, 48 (02) :258-266
[7]   Comparison of bacteriological qualities of various egg yolk sources and the in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or lecithin based diluents [J].
Bousseau, S ;
Brillard, JP ;
Marquant-Le Guienne, B ;
Guérin, B ;
Camus, A ;
Lechat, M .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 1998, 50 (05) :699-706
[8]   LIVABILITY OF BOVINE SPERMATOZOA AT 5, -25, AND -85C IN TRIS-BUFFERED AND CITRATE-BUFFERED YOLK-GLYCEROL EXTENDERS [J].
DAVIS, IS ;
BRATTON, RW ;
FOOTE, RH .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1963, 46 (04) :333-&
[9]   Development of extender based on soybean lecithin for its application in liquid ram semen [J].
de Paz, P. ;
Esteso, M. C. ;
Alvarez, M. ;
Mata, M. ;
Chamorro, C. A. ;
Anel, L. .
THERIOGENOLOGY, 2010, 74 (04) :663-671
[10]   Cryopreservation of Canine Semen - New Challenges [J].
Farstad, W. .
REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2009, 44 :336-341