Low-carbon options for the French power sector: What role for renewables, nuclear energy and carbon capture and storage

被引:46
作者
Shirizadeh, Behrang [1 ,2 ]
Quirion, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] CNRS, CIRED, 45 Bis Ave Belle Gabrielle, F-94736 Nogent Sur Marne, France
[2] TOTAL, Gas Renewables & Power Div, TR&D Grp, 2 Pl Jean Millier, F-92078 Paris, France
关键词
Power system modeling; Variable renewables; Negative emissions; Social cost of carbon; Nudear energy; WIND POWER; COST; REANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the wake of the Paris agreement, France has set a target of zero net greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This target can only be achieved by rapidly decreasing the proportion of fossil fuels and accelerating the deployment of low-carbon technologies. We develop a detailed model of the power sector to investigate the role of different low- and negative-emission technologies in the French electricity mix and we identify the impact of the relative cost of these technologies for various values of the social cost of carbon (SCC). We show that for a wide range of SCC values (from 0 to (sic)500/tCO(2)), the optimal power mix consists of roughly 75% of renewable power. Fora SCC value of (sic)100/tCO(2), the power sector becomes nearly carbon neutral while for (sic)200/tCO(2) and more it provides negative emissions. The availability of negative emission technologies can decrease the system cost by up to 18% and can create up to 20MtCO(2)/year of negative emissions, while the availability of new nuclear power stations is much less important. This study demonstrates the importance of an effective SCC value (as a tax for positive emissions and remuneration for negative emissions) in reaching carbon neutrality at moderate cost Negative emissions may represent an important carbon market which could attract investments if supported by public policies. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[61]   Cost optimal scenarios of a future highly renewable European electricity system: Exploring the influence of weather data, cost parameters and policy constraints [J].
Schlachtberger, D. P. ;
Brown, T. ;
Schaefer, M. ;
Schramm, S. ;
Greiner, M. .
ENERGY, 2018, 163 :100-114
[62]  
Schmidt O., 2019, JOULE, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j. 10.1016/j., DOI 10.1016/J.10.1016/J]
[63]   Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output [J].
Staffell, Iain ;
Pfenninger, Stefan .
ENERGY, 2016, 114 :1224-1239
[64]  
Trigano E., 2013, TECH REP RAPPORT GRO
[65]   The Impact of Operating Reserves on Investment Planning of Renewable Power Systems [J].
van Stiphout, Arne ;
De Vos, Kristof ;
Deconinck, Geert .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (01) :378-388
[66]  
Villavicencio M., 2017, CEEM WORKING PAPERS
[67]   Key technological enablers for ambitious climate goals: insights from the IPCC special report on global warming of 1.5 °C [J].
Waisman, Henri ;
De Coninck, Heleen ;
Rogelj, Joeri .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (11)
[68]   Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs [J].
Wiser, Ryan ;
Jenni, Karen ;
Seel, Joachim ;
Baker, Erin ;
Hand, Maureen ;
Lantz, Eric ;
Smith, Aaron .
NATURE ENERGY, 2016, 1
[69]  
Zerrahn A., 2015, DIW DISCUSSION PAPER, V14057