Effectiveness of infection prevention and control interventions, excluding personal protective equipment, to prevent nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and call for action

被引:12
作者
Jafari, Yalda [1 ]
Yin, Mo [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lim, Cherry [2 ,5 ]
Pople, Diane [6 ]
Evans, Stephanie [6 ]
Stimson, James [6 ]
Pham, Thi Mui [7 ]
Read, Jonathan M. [8 ]
Robotham, Julie V. [6 ,9 ]
Cooper, Ben S. [5 ]
Knight, Gwenan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Ctr Math Modelling Infect Dis, IDE, EPH, London, England
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Trop Med, Mahidol Oxford Trop Med Res Unit, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Univ Med Cluster, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Univ Oxford, Ctr Trop Med, Nuffield Dept Med, Oxford, England
[6] Natl Infect Serv, Healthcare Associated Infect & Antimicrobial Resi, PHE, London, England
[7] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Med Sch, Lancaster, England
[9] Univ Oxford, NIHR Hlth Protect Res Unit Healthcare Associated I, Publ Hlth England, Oxford, England
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
COVID-19;
D O I
10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100192
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions have been adopted by hospitals to limit nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this systematic review is to identify evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions. We conducted a literature search of five databases (OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, COVID-19 Portfolio (pre-print), Web of Science). SWIFT ActiveScreener software was used to screen English titles and abstracts published between 1st January 2020 and 6th April 2021. Intervention studies, defined by Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care, that evaluated IPC interventions with an outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in either patients or healthcare workers were included. Personal protective equipment (PPE) was excluded as this intervention had been previously reviewed. Risks of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool for randomised trials (RoB2) and non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). From 23,156 screened articles, we identified seven articles that met the inclusion criteria, all of which evaluated interventions to prevent infections in healthcare workers and the majority of which were focused on effectiveness of prophylaxes. Due to heterogeneity in interventions, we did not conduct a meta-analysis. All agents used for prophylaxes have little to no evidence of effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infections. We did not find any studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions including but not limited to screening, isolation and improved ventilation. There is limited evidence from interventional studies, excluding PPE, evaluating IPC measures for SARS-CoV-2. This review calls for urgent action to implement such studies to inform policies to protect our most vulnerable populations and healthcare workers. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A systematic review of the effectiveness of cohorting to reduce transmission of healthcare-associated C. difficile and multidrug-resistant organisms [J].
Abad, Cybele L. ;
Barker, Anna K. ;
Safdar, Nasia .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) :691-709
[2]   Efficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine vs Placebo for Pre-exposure SARS-CoV-2 Prophylaxis Among Health Care Workers A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Abella, Benjamin S. ;
Jolkovsky, Eliana L. ;
Biney, Barbara T. ;
Uspal, Julie E. ;
Hyman, Matthew C. ;
Frank, Ian ;
Hensley, Scott E. ;
Gill, Saar ;
Vogl, Dan T. ;
Maillard, Ivan ;
Babushok, Daria, V ;
Huang, Alexander C. ;
Nasta, Sunita D. ;
Walsh, Jennifer C. ;
Wiletyo, E. Paul ;
Gimotty, Phyllis A. ;
Milone, Michael C. ;
Amaravadi, Ravi K. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (02) :195-202
[3]   Low Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Among Patients Exposed to Infected Healthcare Workers [J].
Baker, Meghan A. ;
Fiumara, Karen ;
Rhee, Chanu ;
Williams, Sarah A. ;
Tucker, Robert ;
Wickner, Paige ;
Resnick, Andrew ;
Klompas, Michael .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (07) :E1878-E1880
[4]   Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Bartoszko, Jessica J. ;
Farooqi, Mohammed Abdul Malik ;
Alhazzani, Waleed ;
Loeb, Mark .
INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2020, 14 (04) :365-373
[5]   COVID-19: the case for health-care worker screening to prevent hospital transmission [J].
Black, James R. M. ;
Bailey, Chris ;
Przewrocka, Joanna ;
Dijkstra, Krijn K. ;
Swanton, Charles .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10234) :1418-1420
[6]  
Chahla RE, 2021, medRxiv
[7]   Update Alert 6: Masks for Prevention of Respiratory Virus Infections, Including SARS-CoV-2, in Health Care and Community Settings [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Dana, Tracy ;
Jungbauer, Rebecca .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (09) :W68-W68
[8]   Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chu, Derek K. ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Duda, Stephanie ;
Solo, Karla ;
Yaacoub, Sally ;
Schunemann, Holger J. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10242) :1973-1987
[9]  
Department of Health and Social Care Public Health Wales Public Health Agency Northern Ireland Health Protection Scot- land/National Services Scotland Public Health England NHS England, 2021, 12 DEP HLTH SOC CAR
[10]  
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, INF PREV CONTR PREPR