Sex Differences in Attainment of Independent Funding by Career Development Awardees

被引:185
作者
Jagsi, Reshma [1 ]
Motomura, Amy R.
Griffith, Kent A.
Rangarajan, Soumya
Ubel, Peter A.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
ACADEMIC MEDICINE; GENDER-GAP; PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTS; WOMEN PHYSICIANS; FACULTY; PROMOTION;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Concerns have been raised about the career pipeline in academic medicine, including whether women with a demonstrated commitment to research succeed at the same rate as male colleagues. Objective: To determine the subsequent academic success of recipients of National Institutes of Health (NIH) career development awards. Setting: United States. Participants: 2784 of 2799 (99.5%) recipients of K08 and K23 awards for whom sex could be ascertained from the NIH Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects database and other publicly available sources. Measurements: Actuarial rates at which recipients of K08 and K23 awards from 1997 to 2003 went on to receive R01 awards. Sex-specific rates of R01 award attainment were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and sex differences were assessed by using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Overall, 31.4% of the 1919 K08 awardees and 43.7% of the 865 K23 awardees were female (P < 0.001). Women were less likely than men to receive an R01 award (P < 0.001). The actuarial rate of R01 award attainment at 5 years was 22.7% overall, 18.8% among women, and 24.8% among men. At 10 years, the rate was 42.5% overall, 36.2% among women, and 45.6% among men. Sex persisted as an independent significant predictor of R01 award attainment (hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92]; P = 0.002) in multivariate analysis controlling for K award type, year of award, funding institute, institution, and specialty. Limitation: Whether the lower rate of R01 award achievement among women is due to lower rates of application or lower rates of success in application could not be determined. Conclusion: Only a minority of K awardees studied achieved R01 award funding during the period assessed, and a significant sex disparity was evident.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / W268
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Aisenberg N., 1988, WOMEN ACAD OUTSIDERS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, BIAS BARR FULF POT W
[3]  
Association of Professors of Medicine, 2007, REC REV NAT PHYS SCI
[4]  
Babcock L, 2003, WOMEN DONT ASK: NEGOTIATION AND THE GENDER DIVIDE, P1
[5]  
BLAND CJ, 1986, J MED EDUC, V61, P22
[6]   Women in academic medicine: A report of focus groups and questionnaires, with conjoint analysis [J].
Brown, AJ ;
Swinyard, W ;
Ogle, J .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2003, 12 (10) :999-1008
[7]   Challenges to the transition to independent investigator in geriatric mental health [J].
Bruce, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 11 (03) :356-359
[8]   Obstacles to promotion? Values of women faculty about career success and recognition [J].
Buckley, LM ;
Sanders, K ;
Shih, M ;
Kallar, S ;
Hampton, C .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (03) :283-288
[9]   Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty [J].
Carr, PL ;
Ash, AS ;
Friedman, RH ;
Scaramucci, A ;
Barnett, RC ;
Szalacha, L ;
Palepu, A ;
Moskowitz, MA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 129 (07) :532-+
[10]  
COLLINS KA, 1989, B MED LIBR ASSOC, V77, P8