Simulating ground water-lake interactions: Approaches and insights

被引:52
|
作者
Hunt, RJ
Haitjema, HM
Krohelski, JT
Feinstein, DT
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Middleton, WI 53562 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02586.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Approaches for modeling lake-ground water interactions have evolved significantly from early simulations that used fixed lake stages specified as constant head to sophisticated LAK packages for MODFLOW. Although model input can be complex, the LAK package capabilities and output are superior to methods that rely on a fixed lake stage and compare well to other simple methods where lake stage can be calculated. Regardless of the approach, guidelines presented here for model grid size, location of three-dimensional flow, and extent of vertical capture can facilitate the construction of appropriately detailed models that simulate important lake-ground water interactions without adding unnecessary complexity. In addition to MODFLOW approaches, lake simulation has been formulated in terms of analytic elements. The analytic element lake package had acceptable agreement with a published LAK1 problem, even though there were differences in the total lake conductance and number of layers used in the two models. The grid size used in the original LAK1 problem, however, violated a grid size guideline presented in this paper. Grid sensitivity analyses demonstrated that an appreciable discrepancy in the distribution of stream and lake flux was related to the large grid size used in the original LAK1 problem. This artifact is expected regardless of MODFLOW LAK package used. When the grid size was reduced, a finite-difference formulation approached the analytic element results. These insights and guidelines can help ensure that the proper lake simulation tool is being selected and applied.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 237
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ground water-lake interaction modeling using the LAK3 package for MODFLOW 2000
    Hunt, R
    GROUND WATER, 2003, 41 (02) : 114 - +
  • [2] Simulating Piecewise-Linear Surface Water and Ground Water Interactions with MODFLOW
    Zaadnoordijk, Willem Jan
    GROUND WATER, 2009, 47 (05) : 723 - 726
  • [3] Comparing Approaches for Simulating the Reactive Transport of U(VI) in Ground Water
    Curtis, Gary P.
    Kohler, Matthias
    Davis, James A.
    MINE WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 28 (02) : 84 - 93
  • [4] Comparing Approaches for Simulating the Reactive Transport of U(VI) in Ground Water
    Gary P. Curtis
    Matthias Kohler
    James A. Davis
    Mine Water and the Environment, 2009, 28 : 84 - 93
  • [5] Ground-water, large-lake interactions in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron: A geochemical and isotopic approach
    Kolak, Jonathan J.
    Long, David T.
    Matty, Jane M.
    Larson, Grahame J.
    Sibley, Duncan F.
    Councell, Terry B.
    Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 1999, 111 (02): : 177 - 188
  • [6] Ground-water, large-lake interactions in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron: A geochemical and isotopic approach
    Kolak, JJ
    Long, DT
    Matty, JM
    Larson, GJ
    Sibley, DF
    Councell, TB
    GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN, 1999, 111 (02) : 177 - 188
  • [7] INTERACTIONS BETWEEN GROUND-WATER AND WETLANDS, SOUTHERN SHORE OF LAKE-MICHIGAN, USA
    SHEDLOCK, RJ
    WILCOX, DA
    THOMPSON, TA
    COHEN, DA
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1993, 141 (1-4) : 127 - 155
  • [8] Simulating reservoir leakage in ground-water models
    Fenske, JP
    Leake, SA
    Prudic, DE
    GROUND WATER, 1997, 35 (05) : 895 - 897
  • [9] Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake-Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
    Lu, Chuiyu
    He, Xin
    Zhang, Bo
    Wang, Jianhua
    Kidmose, Jacob
    Jarsjo, Jerker
    WATER, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [10] On modelling of ground and surface water interactions
    Kania, Jaroslaw
    Haladus, Andrzej
    Witczak, Stanislaw
    GROUNDWATER AND ECOSYSTEMS, 2006, 70 : 183 - +