Global potential for material substitution in building construction: The case of cross laminated timber

被引:81
作者
D'Amico, Bernardino [1 ,2 ]
Pomponi, Francesco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hart, Jim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] REBEL Resource Efficient Built Environm Lab, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Inst Sustainabil Leadership CISL, Cambridge, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Buildings; Frame; Structures; Design; Carbon; Mass; LIFE-CYCLE; CARBON EMISSIONS; MASS TIMBER; ENERGY USE; STEEL; DESIGN; WOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123487
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The building and construction sector is a large contributor to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and consumes the vastest amount of natural resources. Widely considered a hard-to-decarbonise sector, improvements in buildings and construction are of fundamental importance for national and global targets to combat climate change. At material level, mitigation opportunities exist in terms of efficiency (using less of the same material) and substitution (using a different material). This article investigates the latter, with a global focus on the use of cross laminated timber to replace concrete floors in steel structural systems. This approach, whilst innovative, does not require any technological development nor upskilling of current professional practice, thus making it an immediately viable solution to accelerate decarbonisation. We combine Material Flow Analysis with Life Cycle Assessment across both spatial and temporal dimensions, accounting for different levels of uptake of the proposed hybrid construction in the next 30 years. Results show that greenhouse gas emissions saving potentials range between 20 and 80 Mt CO(2)e (95% confidence interval) with an average around 50 Mt CO(2)e in the case of full uptake of the hybrid construction system by 2050. Our analysis does not account for carbon sequestration potential in timber, which would make the savings much greater. Still, the overall savings represent a 1.5% reduction of the annual greenhouse gas emissions generally attributed to construction, thus making it a non- trivial contribution to progress towards global targets of net-zero carbon buildings. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abergel T., 2017, ZERO EMISSION EFFICI
[2]   Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne [J].
Allen, Myles R. ;
Frame, David J. ;
Huntingford, Chris ;
Jones, Chris D. ;
Lowe, Jason A. ;
Meinshausen, Malte ;
Meinshausen, Nicolai .
NATURE, 2009, 458 (7242) :1163-1166
[3]  
Allwood J. M., 2012, Sustainable Materials: With Both Eyes Open
[4]   Unrealistic techno-optimism is holding back progress on resource efficiency [J].
Allwood, Julian M. .
NATURE MATERIALS, 2018, 17 (12) :1050-1051
[5]   Material efficiency: A white paper [J].
Allwood, Julian M. ;
Ashby, Michael F. ;
Gutowski, Timothy G. ;
Worrell, Ernst .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 55 (03) :362-381
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 6 ORSM ROAD TIMB OFF
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EN TECHN TRANS IND S
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ANAL MUCH CARBON BUD
[9]  
Arup Foresight Research Innovation, 2019, RETH TIMB BUILD
[10]   Design of Truss Structures Through Reuse [J].
Brutting, Jan ;
Desruelle, Joseph ;
Senatore, Gennaro ;
Fivet, Corentin .
STRUCTURES, 2019, 18 :128-137