CO2 plume migration and dissolution in layered reservoirs

被引:31
作者
Wen, Gege [1 ]
Benson, Sally M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resource Engn, Rm 153,367 Panama St, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resource Engn, Suite 324,Rm 315,473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
CO2; storage; Heterogeneity; Plume footprint; Dissolution; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; HETEROGENEITY; STORAGE; SEQUESTRATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.05.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects, the presence of layered permeability heterogeneity can strongly affect the migration of the supercritical CO2 plume and CO2 dissolution. By conducting a systematic study of plume migration in layered reservoirs with a wide range of permeability contrast between the layers, we show that the relationship between CO2 plume footprint and permeability contrast has three distinct regimes. For moderate permeability contrasts from 1 to 5, the presence of different layers has little impact on plume migration. As the contrast increases from 5 to 50, the plume footprint decreases progressively. In the event of extreme contrast (> 50), the footprint is smallest and independent of the heterogeneity. Overall, the footprint of the plume can vary by more than 2-fold, with large implications for monitoring, access to sites, and regulatory issues. The mass fraction of CO2 dissolution can vary up to 2-fold depending on the degree of heterogeneity. We also show that the common practice of using permeability anisotropy to simulate multiphase flows in layered reservoirs works quite well in terms of plume footprint for permeability anisotropy ratios of up to 25, but large errors occur at more extreme contrasts.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 79
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bryant SL., 2006, Paper SPE 99938 proceedings of SPE/DOE symposium on improved oil recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, P22, DOI [10.2118/99938-MS, DOI 10.2118/99938-MS]
[2]   A new and extended Sleipner Benchmark model for CO2 storage simulations in the Utsira Formation [J].
Cavanagh, Andrew ;
Nazarian, Bamshad .
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 :2831-2835
[3]  
Corey A. T., 1956, J PETROL TECHNOL, V8, P69, DOI DOI 10.2118/744-G
[4]   Modeling supercritical carbon dioxide injection in heterogeneous porous media [J].
Doughty, C ;
Pruess, K .
VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2004, 3 (03) :837-847
[5]   Investigation of CO2 Plume Behavior for a Large-Scale Pilot Test of Geologic Carbon Storage in a Saline Formation [J].
Doughty, Christine .
TRANSPORT IN POROUS MEDIA, 2010, 82 (01) :49-76
[6]  
EPA, 2013, GEOL SEQ CARB DIOX U, P96
[7]   An overview of the Illinois Basin - Decatur Project [J].
Finley, Robert J. .
GREENHOUSE GASES-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 4 (05) :571-579
[8]   Heterogeneous saline formations for carbon dioxide disposal: Impact of varying heterogeneity on containment and trapping [J].
Flett, Matthew ;
Gurton, Randal ;
Weir, Geoff .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 57 (1-2) :106-118
[9]   Estimating CO2 plume size: A correlation for site screening [J].
Frailey, Scott M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 13 :230-234
[10]   CO2 trapping in reservoirs with fluvial architecture: Sensitivity to heterogeneity in permeability and constitutive relationship parameters for different rock types [J].
Gershenzon, Naum I. ;
Ritzi, Robert W. ;
Dominic, David F. ;
Mehnert, Edward ;
Okwen, Roland T. ;
Patterson, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 155 :89-99