Can We Calibrate a Daily Time-Step Hydrological Model Using Monthly Time-Step Discharge Data?

被引:20
作者
Adla, Soham [1 ]
Tripathi, Shivam [2 ]
Disse, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Dept Civil Geo & Environm Engn, D-80333 Munich, Germany
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Civil Engn, Hydraul & Water Resources Engn, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
hydrological modeling; model calibration; model performance; model validation; SWAT model; rainfall-runoff; observation frequency; uncertainty; WATER ASSESSMENT-TOOL; SWAT MODEL; QUALITY MODEL; RIVER-BASIN; SOIL; SCALE; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION; FLOW; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/w11091750
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrological models are generally calibrated at longer time-steps (monthly, seasonal, or annual) than their computational time-step (daily), because of better calibration performance, lower computational requirements, and the lack of reliable temporally-fine observed discharge data (particularly in developing countries). The consequences of having different calibration and computation time-steps on model performance have not been extensively investigated. This study uses the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to explore the correctness of calibrating a hydrological model at the monthly time-step even if the problem statement is suited to monthly modeling. Multiple SWAT models were set up for an agricultural watershed in the Indo-Gangetic basin. The models were calibrated with observed discharge data of different time-steps (daily and monthly) and were validated on data with the same or different time-steps. Intra- and inter-decadal comparisons were conducted to reinforce the results. The models calibrated on monthly data marginally outperformed the models calibrated on daily data when validated on monthly data, in terms of P-factor, R-factor, the coefficient of determination (R-2), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). However, the monthly-calibrated models performed poorly as compared to daily-calibrated models when validated on daily discharge data. Moreover, the daily simulations from the monthly-calibrated models were unrealistic. Analysis of the calibrated parameters revealed that the daily- and monthly-calibrated models differed significantly in terms of parameters governing channel and groundwater processes. Thus, though the monthly-calibrated model captures the patterns in monthly discharge data fairly well, it fails to characterize daily rainfall-runoff processes. The results challenge the existing practice of using different calibration and computation time-steps in hydrological modeling, and suggest that the two time-steps should be the same, irrespective of the time-step required for modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abbaspour C. K, 2015, SWAT CALIBRATING UNC
[2]   A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model [J].
Abbaspour, K. C. ;
Rouholahnejad, E. ;
Vaghefi, S. ;
Srinivasan, R. ;
Yang, H. ;
Klove, B. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 524 :733-752
[3]   Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT [J].
Abbaspour, Karim C. ;
Yang, Jing ;
Maximov, Ivan ;
Siber, Rosi ;
Bogner, Konrad ;
Mieleitner, Johanna ;
Zobrist, Juerg ;
Srinivasan, Raghavan .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 333 (2-4) :413-430
[4]  
Abbaspour KC, 2004, VADOSE ZONE J, V3, P1340
[5]  
Adla S., 2017, P HYDRO 2017 22 INT
[6]  
Adla S., 2014, P HYDRO 2014 19 INT, P531
[7]   Detecting spatio-temporal changes in the extent of seasonal and annual flooding in South Asia using multi-resolution satellite data [J].
Amarnath, Giriraj ;
Ameer, Mohamed ;
Aggarwal, Pramod ;
Smakhtin, Vladimir .
EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING/GIS APPLICATIONS III, 2012, 8538
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1972, NAT ENG HDB
[9]  
Arnold JG, 2012, T ASABE, V55, P1491
[10]  
Arnold J.G., 2002, TR191 TWRI, DOI [10.1055/s-0029-1192096, DOI 10.1055/S-0029-1192096]