Improving the Context Supporting Quality Improvement in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Quality Collaborative: An Exploratory Field Study

被引:6
作者
Grooms, Heather R. [1 ,2 ]
Froehle, Craig M. [2 ,3 ]
Provost, Lloyd P. [4 ]
Handyside, James [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Kaplan, Heather C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[3] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
[4] Associates Proc Improvement, Austin, TX USA
[5] Improvis Healthcare Inc, Lucan, ON, Canada
[6] Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT USA
[7] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
quality improvement; context; organizational models; Vermont Oxford Network; Model for Understanding Success in Quality; UNDERSTANDING SUCCESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1062860616644323
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Successful quality improvement (QI) requires a supportive context. The goal was to determine whether a structured curriculum could help QI teams improve the context supporting their QI work. An exploratory field study was conducted of 43 teams participating in a neonatal intensive care unit QI collaborative. Using a curriculum based on the Model for Understanding Success in Quality, teams identified gaps in their context and tested interventions to modify context. Surveys and self-reflective journals were analyzed to understand how teams developed changes to modify context. More than half (55%) targeted contextual improvements within the microsystem, focusing on motivation and culture. Information sharing interventions to communicate information about the project as a strategy to engage more staff were the most common interventions tested. Further study is needed to determine if efforts to modify context consistently lead to greater outcome improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 321
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   BRIDGING THE BOUNDARY - EXTERNAL ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (04) :634-665
[2]  
Blumer Herbert, 1969, SYMBOLIC INTERACTION
[3]  
Boyatzis R.E., 2010, Coaching teams for sustained, P168
[4]   An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective [J].
Boyatzis, Richard E. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 25 (07) :607-623
[5]  
Burt R.S., 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[6]  
Cooperrider DavidL., 2005, APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY
[7]  
Edmondson AC, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1155, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586086
[8]  
Egan T.M., 2005, Organization Development Journal, V23, P29
[9]   GROUPS IN CONTEXT - A MODEL OF TASK GROUP EFFECTIVENESS [J].
GLADSTEIN, DL .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1984, 29 (04) :499-517
[10]   An exploratory analysis of the Model for Understanding Success in Quality [J].
Kaplan, Heather C. ;
Froehle, Craig M. ;
Cassedy, Amy ;
Provost, Lloyd P. ;
Margolis, Peter A. .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 38 (04) :325-338