Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach to prioritization of space debris for removal

被引:10
作者
Bazzocchi, Michael C. F. [1 ,2 ]
Miguel Sanchez-Lozano, Juan [3 ]
Hakima, Houman [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Clarkson Univ, Mech & Aeronaut Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[3] Univ Ctr Def, Spanish Air Force Acad, MDE UPCT, San Javier, Spain
[4] Space Strategies Consulting Ltd SSCL, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
Space debris prioritization; Active debris removal; Multi-criteria decision-making; Fuzzy sets; Analytic hierarchy process; Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; RANKING; DESIGN; TOPSIS; ORBIT; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.006
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
As private companies and government space agencies begin to seriously consider the task of active space debris removal, it is becoming increasingly more important to determine the highest priority objects to deorbit. This work sets forth an approach for prioritization of space debris through the utilization of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methodologies and fuzzy logic, as well as both quantitative and qualitative criteria. The proposed debris prioritization approach considers various criteria including the orbit, size, mass, pairwise and total collision probabilities, and decay timeframe of each debris object. The means of assigning attributes to each assessment criterion is discussed in detail. To determine the weighting scheme for the criteria, a questionnaire was prepared and shared with experts in the field of space situational awareness. The work examines over two thousand critical debris objects selected from the existing debris catalog with respect to these criteria. The quantified attributes for each debris object are then aggregated through the fuzzy versions of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. The results of the analysis identify high-priority debris objects for removal from Earth-bound orbits. (C) 2020 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1155 / 1173
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Alfano S., 2007, 17 AAS AIAA SPAC FLI
[2]  
Alfano S., 2005, 15 AAS AIAA ASTR SPE
[3]   Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: A new approach [J].
Alonso, Jose Antonio ;
Lamata, M. Teresa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2006, 14 (04) :445-459
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, COMPUTING WORDS IN 1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic
[7]   Ranking upper stages in low Earth orbit for active removal [J].
Anselmo, L. ;
Pardini, C. .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 122 :19-27
[8]  
Bellman R.E., 1970, CR1594 NASA
[9]   ON A SHORT-COMING OF SAATY METHOD OF ANALYTIC HIERARCHIES [J].
BELTON, V ;
GEAR, T .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 11 (03) :228-230
[10]   Bi-objective optimization of a multiple-target active debris removal mission [J].
Berend, Nicolas ;
Olive, Xavier .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2016, 122 :324-335