The effect of ethanol concentration on the morphological and molecular preservation of insects for biodiversity studies

被引:46
作者
Marquina, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Buczek, Mateusz [3 ]
Ronquist, Fredrik [1 ]
Lukasik, Piotr [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Museum Nat Hist, Dept Bioinformat & Genet, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Zool, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Fac Biol, Inst Environm Sci, Krakow, Poland
来源
PEERJ | 2021年 / 9卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Insects; Ethanol; DNA preservation; Morphology; Collection;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.10799
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Traditionally, insects collected for scientific purposes have been dried and pinned, or preserved in 70% ethanol. Both methods preserve taxonomically informative exoskeletal structures well but are suboptimal for preserving DNA for molecular biology. Highly concentrated ethanol (95-100%), preferred as a DNA preservative, has generally been assumed to make specimens brittle and prone to breaking. However, systematic studies on the correlation between ethanol concentration and specimen preservation are lacking. Here, we tested how preservative ethanol concentration in combination with different sample handling regimes affect the integrity of seven insect species representing four orders, and differing substantially in the level of sclerotization. After preservation and treatments (various levels of disturbance), we counted the number of appendages (legs, wings, antennae, or heads) that each specimen had lost. Additionally, we assessed the preservation of DNA after long-term storage by comparing the ratio of PCR amplicon copy numbers to an added artificial standard. We found that high ethanol concentrations indeed induce brittleness in insects. However, the magnitude and nature of the effect varied strikingly among species. In general, ethanol concentrations at or above 90% made the insects more brittle, but for species with robust, thicker exoskeletons, this did not translate to an increased loss of appendages. Neither freezing the samples nor drying the insects after immersion in ethanol had a negative effect on the retention of appendages. However, the morphology of the insects was severely damaged if they were allowed to dry. We also found that DNA preserves less well at lower ethanol concentrations when stored at room temperature for an extended period. However, the magnitude of the effect varies among species; the concentrations at which the number of COI amplicon copies relative to the standard was significantly decreased compared to 95% ethanol ranged from 90% to as low as 50%. While higher ethanol concentrations positively affect long-term DNA preservation, there is a clear trade-off between preserving insects for morphological examination and genetic analysis. The optimal ethanol concentration for the latter is detrimental for the former, and vice versa. These trade-offs need to be considered in large insect biodiversity surveys and other projects aiming to combine molecular work with traditional morphology-based characterization of collected specimens.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Building freshwater macroinvertebrate DNA-barcode libraries from reference collection material: formalin preservation vs specimen age
    Baird, Donald J.
    Pascoe, Timothy J.
    Zhou, Xin
    Hajibabaei, Mehrdad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 30 (01): : 125 - 130
  • [2] Boyle Robert., 1664, Some Considerations Touching the Usefulnesse of Experimental Natural Philosophy: Propos'd in a Familiar Discourse to a Friend, by Way of Invitation to the Study of It
  • [3] glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling
    Brooks, Mollie E.
    Kristensen, Kasper
    van Benthem, Koen J.
    Magnusson, Arni
    Berg, Casper W.
    Nielsen, Anders
    Skaug, Hans J.
    Machler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    [J]. R JOURNAL, 2017, 9 (02): : 378 - 400
  • [4] Can non-destructive DNA extraction of bulk invertebrate samples be used for metabarcoding?
    Carew, Melissa E.
    Coleman, Rhys A.
    Hoffman, Ary A.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [5] Detecting invertebrate species in archived collections using next-generation sequencing
    Carew, Melissa E.
    Metzeling, Leon
    St Clair, Rosalind
    Hoffmann, Ary A.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2017, 17 (05) : 915 - 930
  • [6] Carvalho Alfredo O. R., 2000, Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil, V29, P489, DOI 10.1590/S0301-80592000000300011
  • [7] Comparison of preservation techniques for DNA extraction from hymenopterous insects
    Dillon, N
    Austin, AD
    Bartowsky, E
    [J]. INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 5 (01) : 21 - 24
  • [8] Acetone preservation: a practical technique for molecular analysis
    Fukatsu, T
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1999, 8 (11) : 1935 - 1945
  • [9] Ginestet C, 2011, USE R, V174, P245, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3_1
  • [10] Adapterama II: universal amplicon sequencing on Illumina platforms (TaggiMatrix)
    Glenn, Travis C.
    Pierson, Todd W.
    Bayona-Vasquez, Natalia J.
    Kieran, Troy J.
    Hoffberg, Sandra L.
    Thomas, Jesse C.
    Lefever, Daniel E.
    Finger, John W.
    Gao, Bei
    Bian, Xiaoming
    Louha, Swarnali
    Kolli, Ramya T.
    Bentley, Kerin
    Rushmore, Julie
    Wong, Kelvin
    Shaw, Timothy, I
    Rothrock, Michael J., Jr.
    McKee, Anna M.
    Guo, Tai L.
    Mauricio, Rodney
    Molina, Marirosa
    Cummings, Brian S.
    Lash, Lawrence H.
    Lu, Kun
    Gilbert, Gregory S.
    Hubbell, Stephen P.
    Faircloth, Brant C.
    [J]. PEERJ, 2019, 7