Framework of six linguistic lattice-valued evaluation system

被引:0
作者
Meng, Dan [1 ]
Jia, Huading
Zhang, Zaiqiang
Xu, Yang
机构
[1] SW Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ Informat Engn, Chengdu 610074, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Inst Image & Graph, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] SW Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] SW Jiaotong Univ, Dept Math, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
DYNAMICS OF CONTINUOUS DISCRETE AND IMPULSIVE SYSTEMS-SERIES B-APPLICATIONS & ALGORITHMS | 2006年 / 13卷
关键词
artificial intelligence; lattice implication algebra; lattice-valued logic; linguistic evaluation system;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Fuzziness and incomparability are two kinds of uncertainty often associated with human's intelligent activities in the real world, and they exist not only in the processed object itself, but also in the course of the object being dealt with. There are some research work on fuzziness and linguistic variable, and they has been applied with very good results to different problems which include "information retrieval", "clinical diagnosis", "marketing", "risk in software development", "materials selection", "decision-making and evaluation" etc. It is shown that these approaches are adequate in some situations especially for fuzziness attribute. However, it is inadequate to deal with the incomparable information related to human perception and judgment in natural language. So we have to choose an appropriate linguistic descriptions for this kind of incomparable information and give a reasonable semantic explanation for them. In this paper, a linguistic lattice-value evaluation model based on six linguistic truth-value lattice implication algebra is given. It is a new attempt to represent fuzzy and incomparable attribute from the point of linguistic lattice-value logic system.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 230
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A fuzzy-linguistic approach to a multi-criteria sequencing problem [J].
Adamopoulos, GI ;
Pappis, CP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 92 (03) :628-636
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STUD FUZZINESS SOFT
[3]   A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators [J].
Bordogna, G ;
Fedrizzi, M ;
Pasi, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1997, 27 (01) :126-132
[4]  
BORDOGNA G, 1993, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V44, P126
[5]   Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation [J].
Cheng, CH ;
Lin, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) :174-186
[6]  
Degani R., 1988, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/0888-613X(88)90105-3
[7]   LINGUISTIC DECISION-MAKING MODELS [J].
DELGADO, M ;
VERDEGAY, JL ;
VILA, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 1992, 7 (05) :479-492
[8]   An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model in decision-making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Martinez, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2000, 8 (05) :539-562
[9]   A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [J].
Herrera, F ;
Martínez, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2000, 8 (06) :746-752
[10]   A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making [J].
Herrera, F ;
Martínez, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART B-CYBERNETICS, 2001, 31 (02) :227-234