Comparison of 1 and 2 days per week of strength training in children

被引:103
作者
Faigenbaum, AD
Milliken, LA
Loud, RL
Burak, BT
Doherty, CL
Westcott, WL
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Exercise Sci & Phys Educ, Boston, MA 02125 USA
[2] S Shore YMCA, Quincy, MA USA
关键词
frequency; preadolescent; resistance training; weight training;
D O I
10.1080/02701367.2002.10609041
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Purpose of this study was to compare the effects of I and 2 days per week of strength training on upper body strength, lower body strength, and motor performance ability in children. Twenty-one girls and 34 boys between the ages of 7.1 and 12.3 years volunteered to participate in this study. Participants strength trained either once per week (n = 22) or twice per week (n = 20) for 8 weeks at a community-based youth fitness center Each training session consisted of a single set of 10-15 repetitions on 12 exercises using child-size weight machines. Thirteen children who did not strength train served as age-matched controls. One repetition maximum (IRM) strength on the chest press and leg press, handgrip strength, longjump, vedical jump, and flexibility were assessed at baseline and posttraining. Only Participants who strength trained twice per week made significantly greater gains in IRM chest press strength, compared to the control group (11.5 and 4.4% respectively, p < .05). Participants who trained once and twice per week made gains in IRM leg press strength (14.2 and 24.7%, respectively) that we, re significantly greater than control group gains (2.4%). On average, participants who strength trained once Per week achieved 67% of the IRM strength gains. No significant differences between groups were observed on other outcome measures. These findings support the concept that muscular strength can be improved during the childhood years and favor a training frequency of twice Per week for children participating in an introductory strength training program.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 424
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*AM ORTH SOC SPORT, 1988, P C STRENGTH TRAIN P
[2]  
American Alliance for Health Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 1980, HLTH REL PHYS FITN T
[3]  
American College of Sports Medicine, 2000, ACSMS GUID EX TEST P
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, J STRENGTH COND RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1996, STRENGTH COND J
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PHYS ACT HLTH REP SU
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, PEDIATR EXERC SCI
[8]  
Blimkie CJ, 1989, Perspectives in Exercise Science and Sports, P99
[9]   COMPARISON OF 2 VS 3 DAYS WEEK OF VARIABLE RESISTANCE TRAINING DURING 10-WEEK AND 18-WEEK PROGRAMS [J].
BRAITH, RW ;
GRAVES, JE ;
POLLOCK, ML ;
LEGGETT, SL ;
CARPENTER, DM ;
COLVIN, AB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1989, 10 (06) :450-454
[10]  
BROOKS GA, 1996, EXERCISE PHYSL