Improved Glycemic Control With Intraperitoneal Versus Subcutaneous Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes A randomized controlled trial

被引:44
作者
Logtenberg, Susan J. [1 ]
Kleefstra, Nanne [1 ,2 ]
Houweling, Sebastiaan T. [1 ,2 ]
Groenier, Klaas H. [3 ,4 ]
Gans, Reinold O. [4 ,5 ]
van Ballegooie, Evert [2 ]
Bilo, Henk J. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Isala Clin, Ctr Diabet, Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Langerhans Med Res Grp, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Internal Med, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
BLOOD-GLUCOSE STABILITY; PUMP THERAPY; IMPLANTABLE PUMPS; EXTERNAL PUMPS; INFUSION; METAANALYSIS; LISPRO; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INJECTIONS; ABSORPTION;
D O I
10.2337/dc08-2340
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) with an implantable pump has been available for the past 25 years. CIPII, with its specific pharmacodynamic properties, may be a viable treatment alternative to improve glycemic control in patients with type I diabetes for whom other therapies have failed. There have been few Studies in which CIPII was compared with subcutaneous insulin treatment for patients with type I diabetes with poor glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - in an open-label, prospective, crossover, randomized, 16-month study, the effects of CIPII and subcutaneous insulin were compared in 24 patients. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of hypoglycemia. Secondary outcome measures were A1C, and glucose profile, including Lime in euglycemia, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS - The incidence of grade 1 hypoglycemic events was 4.0 +/- 2.6 per week with subcutaneous insulin compared with 3.5 +/- 2.3 per week during CIPII (P = 0.13). The absolute mean difference in A1C With CIPII compared with subcutaneous treatment was -0.76% (95% Cl - 1.41 to -0.11) (P = 0.03). Baseline time spent in euglycemia was 45.2 +/- 12.6% and increased 10.9% (4.6-17.3) with CIPII compared with Subcutaneous treatment (absolute value; P = 0.003). There were no differences in the occurrence rate for severe hypoglycemic events daily insulin use, or BMI. No pump or catheter malfunction was Observed during the study. CONCLUSIONS - Although we did not observe a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events, improved glycemic control was achieved with the use of CIPII. We saw a 0.8% decrease in A1C and an 11% increase in the time spent in euglycemia.
引用
收藏
页码:1372 / 1377
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIABETES METAB PT 2
[2]   MONOMERIC INSULINS AND THEIR EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
BRANGE, J ;
OWENS, DR ;
KANG, S ;
VOLUND, A .
DIABETES CARE, 1990, 13 (09) :923-954
[3]  
Catargi B, 2002, DIABETES METAB, V28, P133
[4]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[5]   Are analogue insulins better than soluble in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion? Results of a meta-analysis [J].
Colquitt, J ;
Royle, P ;
Waugh, N .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (10) :863-866
[6]  
COLQUITT JL, 2004, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V43, P1
[7]  
Díaz-Uriarte R, 2002, ANIM BEHAV, V63, P815
[8]   PERITONEAL AND SUBCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION OF INSULIN IN TYPE-I DIABETIC SUBJECTS [J].
GIACCA, A ;
CAUMO, A ;
GALIMBERTI, G ;
PETRELLA, G ;
LIBRENTI, MC ;
SCAVINI, M ;
POZZA, G ;
MICOSSI, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1993, 77 (03) :738-742
[9]   A COST-BENEFIT COMPARISON OF INTENSIVE DIABETES MANAGEMENT WITH IMPLANTABLE PUMPS VERSUS MULTIPLE SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE-I DIABETES [J].
HAARDT, MJ ;
SELAM, JL ;
SLAMA, G ;
BETHOUX, JP ;
DORANGE, C ;
MACE, B ;
RAMANICHE, ML ;
BRUZZO, F .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (08) :847-851
[10]   2-PERIOD CROSSOVER CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
HILLS, M ;
ARMITAGE, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1979, 8 (01) :7-20